31) TPP & Global Treaties/’Arrangements’; Sovereignty vs. Cyber ‘Justice’

The Threat of the Unknown/Secrets.

Global Corporations no longer sue each other, but, sue the lil’ guy via your Signatory Gov’t. without Your Defense Input & NO Appeals. Your Gov’t. Can’t sue the Global Corps.
If ‘your’ politician hasn’t read & understood the TPP, et al, then why are YOU listening to an Expensive, but, Uninformed Opinion based upon ‘Beliefs’ & not Facts? (Please see; ‘Tired of your Political Representatives’ “Non-Answer Responses” (Talking Points)? A SIMPLE DIAGNOSTIC TEST of your DEMOCRACY’. See; davidehsmith.wordpress.com)
What is the Info that Corporate Canada (& PM Harper) is Depriving the other Treaty Signatories of & How much will the Deprivation Cost the harmless lil’ guy in Canada, New Zealand, et al? You Should Have Known (later)… (the Secret?), so Just say ‘No’ now.

All of the signatory countries have legislation similar to SEC. 108. SOVEREIGNTY. (a) UNITED STATES (ie. the ‘host’ country) LAW TO PREVAIL IN EVENT OF CONFLICT, 1986 (re; … in the event of conflict with a ‘foreign’ country).

The point of the flurry of global corporate treaties/’arrangements’ is that these laws of the host countries allegedly inhibit/retards/prevents the investment in businesses & industries, and thus, deprive corporations & their shareholders of profits/dividends, particularly in the development, extraction, financing, servicing, etc. of natural resources in environmentally conscientious countries like Canada.

And therefore, by creating a new superseding global jurisdiction with its own secret legal tribunals (for ‘dispute resolutions’) the ‘aggrieved’ businesses can ‘sue’ the encumbering ‘lesser’ jurisdictions (state, county, municipalities and federal) at the global level, where the ‘guilty’, lesser jurisdictions do not pay out of their right pocket (ie. state taxes), but, do pay out from their left pocket (federal taxes) with all other Americans who have agreed to ratify the treaties without the representation of the individual state to defend itself, or, hear the evidence against the individual state, or, appeal the decisions, &/or, the amounts to be awarded, etc.

Some have suggested that the treaty/’arrangements’ seem to lend itself to abuse by the global (not including the members of BRICS) corporate economy. But, because the tribunals, the disbursement of the legal fees (whatever they decide to charge), damages (as high as they want), etc. are working in secret, it has been argued, it really won’t matter to the grassroots of America because poor is still poor.

Therefore, one of the many points considered in

‘The Submission’:
“The SHAREHOLDERS & Corporations of AMERICA, Canada, the EU, the Trans Pacific nations, et al
the harmless Native & non Native Canadian NON shareholders, et al”

is; what are the various different ways that the harmless Native & non Native Canadians, et al, can be heard by the federal courts to defend itself against foreign corporations and domestic corporations, ie. Corporate Canada,
& their relationship to the Canadian government by way of Corporate Canada’s lobbyists paying considerations to the executives of the political parties.

This relationship is considered in ‘The MERKEL (Chancellor of Germany) Letter; To Sue, or, Be Sued’ which is part of ‘The Submission’ to The Supreme Court of Canada.
(‘The MERKEL Letter’ & excerpts of ‘The Submission’ can be accessed at

And, if the taxpayers can’t get together to pay the high cost of long term litigation, who are the interested parties that would consider suing the ‘global’ corporate economy on a contingency basis (ie. investment litigation)? And, who could get Corporate America, &/or, their corporate associates to pay?

President Putin, et al, might consider paying for the litigation just to embarrass Corporate America & the Global Corporate Economy; ie. making money while depriving the Global Corporate Economy of their aspirations to create their (capitalist) version of the global subjugation of communism…
Putin, et al, might also consider the litigation in a more serious manner in order to off-set the American led sanctions against Russia as per the on going situation in the Ukraine.

Similarly, one might consider under what circumstances would Warren Buffett, or, the ‘coveted’ Hong Kong investor, et al, might consider financing the litigation? Would their involvement re-stabilize the world for ‘honest’ businesses that are respectful of the ‘lesser’ jurisdictions, et al?

On the other hand, how would Corporate America, their corporate associates and their Shareholders respond to being socially shunned, deprived of services/business, access to state/municipally owned roads, sewers, water, etc., let alone become the recipients of civil disobedience? That is to say, under what circumstances would Corporate America & their Shareholders, et al, begin to act like ‘good corporate citizens’ of their host countries, including at home in the U.S. of A., when the alternative is for them being treated in an unwelcomed manner (persona non grata) & encouraged to leave with their families while being prevented, limited, &/or, regulated from being able to conduct business in the U.S., &/or, with respectful American businesses, &/or, any level of American governments?

It may be regrettable that as a consequence of the treaties/’arrangements’ the present under-funding of the investigations into the illegal money laundering by terrorist related drug cartels, et al, would be further be eroded as their illegal/secret profits will be encouraged to be invested in the Global Corporate Economy in an un discernible, but, ‘not unwelcomed’ manner by the un conscientious global corporate economy.

By way of closing, there are any number of processes & procedures of law that will be deliberately circumvented by the developers (including the thousands of the most successful & devious lawyers in the signatory nations) of the treaties/’arrangements’ with provisions for secretly increasing the abuses in perpetuity.

And, given the severe blow that the treaties/’arrangements’ are giving to our ‘democracies’ it may be worth repeating yet again,

‘What the TREATY of VERSAILLES was to the 20th century PALES in COMPARISON to the TPP, CETA, C-CIT, NAFTA, et al, in the 21st’.

And, how will YOUR submission to YOUR highest court IMPROVE upon The Submission that is presently before The Supreme Court of Canada?

By way of closing, I look forward to reading about your thoughts, your questions, your feelings, your improvements, etc., & those of your readers, regarding the enclosed.

If you should have any more questions or problems with this issue, &/or, any other, I can be contacted at the enclosed numbers & addresses.

David E.H. Smith
– Researcher
– ‘Qui tam…’
For more Information & Questions re; The Relationship between Human (Nature) Rights & Economics by way of the TTIP, the CET Agreement, TPP, C-CI Treaty, et al, and The WAD Accord
see; davidehsmith.wordpress.com
Please consider sharing the enclosed information & questions with 10 friends who will share it with 10 others…


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s