31) TPP & Global Treaties/’Arrangements’; Sovereignty vs. Cyber ‘Justice’

The Threat of the Unknown/Secrets.

Global Corporations no longer sue each other, but, sue the lil’ guy via your Signatory Gov’t. without Your Defense Input & NO Appeals. Your Gov’t. Can’t sue the Global Corps.
If ‘your’ politician hasn’t read & understood the TPP, et al, then why are YOU listening to an Expensive, but, Uninformed Opinion based upon ‘Beliefs’ & not Facts? (Please see; ‘Tired of your Political Representatives’ “Non-Answer Responses” (Talking Points)? A SIMPLE DIAGNOSTIC TEST of your DEMOCRACY’. See; davidehsmith.wordpress.com)
What is the Info that Corporate Canada (& PM Harper) is Depriving the other Treaty Signatories of & How much will the Deprivation Cost the harmless lil’ guy in Canada, New Zealand, et al? You Should Have Known (later)… (the Secret?), so Just say ‘No’ now.

All of the signatory countries have legislation similar to SEC. 108. SOVEREIGNTY. (a) UNITED STATES (ie. the ‘host’ country) LAW TO PREVAIL IN EVENT OF CONFLICT, 1986 (re; … in the event of conflict with a ‘foreign’ country).

The point of the flurry of global corporate treaties/’arrangements’ is that these laws of the host countries allegedly inhibit/retards/prevents the investment in businesses & industries, and thus, deprive corporations & their shareholders of profits/dividends, particularly in the development, extraction, financing, servicing, etc. of natural resources in environmentally conscientious countries like Canada.

And therefore, by creating a new superseding global jurisdiction with its own secret legal tribunals (for ‘dispute resolutions’) the ‘aggrieved’ businesses can ‘sue’ the encumbering ‘lesser’ jurisdictions (state, county, municipalities and federal) at the global level, where the ‘guilty’, lesser jurisdictions do not pay out of their right pocket (ie. state taxes), but, do pay out from their left pocket (federal taxes) with all other Americans who have agreed to ratify the treaties without the representation of the individual state to defend itself, or, hear the evidence against the individual state, or, appeal the decisions, &/or, the amounts to be awarded, etc.

Some have suggested that the treaty/’arrangements’ seem to lend itself to abuse by the global (not including the members of BRICS) corporate economy. But, because the tribunals, the disbursement of the legal fees (whatever they decide to charge), damages (as high as they want), etc. are working in secret, it has been argued, it really won’t matter to the grassroots of America because poor is still poor.

Therefore, one of the many points considered in

‘The Submission’:
“The SHAREHOLDERS & Corporations of AMERICA, Canada, the EU, the Trans Pacific nations, et al
the harmless Native & non Native Canadian NON shareholders, et al”

is; what are the various different ways that the harmless Native & non Native Canadians, et al, can be heard by the federal courts to defend itself against foreign corporations and domestic corporations, ie. Corporate Canada,
& their relationship to the Canadian government by way of Corporate Canada’s lobbyists paying considerations to the executives of the political parties.

This relationship is considered in ‘The MERKEL (Chancellor of Germany) Letter; To Sue, or, Be Sued’ which is part of ‘The Submission’ to The Supreme Court of Canada.
(‘The MERKEL Letter’ & excerpts of ‘The Submission’ can be accessed at

And, if the taxpayers can’t get together to pay the high cost of long term litigation, who are the interested parties that would consider suing the ‘global’ corporate economy on a contingency basis (ie. investment litigation)? And, who could get Corporate America, &/or, their corporate associates to pay?

President Putin, et al, might consider paying for the litigation just to embarrass Corporate America & the Global Corporate Economy; ie. making money while depriving the Global Corporate Economy of their aspirations to create their (capitalist) version of the global subjugation of communism…
Putin, et al, might also consider the litigation in a more serious manner in order to off-set the American led sanctions against Russia as per the on going situation in the Ukraine.

Similarly, one might consider under what circumstances would Warren Buffett, or, the ‘coveted’ Hong Kong investor, et al, might consider financing the litigation? Would their involvement re-stabilize the world for ‘honest’ businesses that are respectful of the ‘lesser’ jurisdictions, et al?

On the other hand, how would Corporate America, their corporate associates and their Shareholders respond to being socially shunned, deprived of services/business, access to state/municipally owned roads, sewers, water, etc., let alone become the recipients of civil disobedience? That is to say, under what circumstances would Corporate America & their Shareholders, et al, begin to act like ‘good corporate citizens’ of their host countries, including at home in the U.S. of A., when the alternative is for them being treated in an unwelcomed manner (persona non grata) & encouraged to leave with their families while being prevented, limited, &/or, regulated from being able to conduct business in the U.S., &/or, with respectful American businesses, &/or, any level of American governments?

It may be regrettable that as a consequence of the treaties/’arrangements’ the present under-funding of the investigations into the illegal money laundering by terrorist related drug cartels, et al, would be further be eroded as their illegal/secret profits will be encouraged to be invested in the Global Corporate Economy in an un discernible, but, ‘not unwelcomed’ manner by the un conscientious global corporate economy.

By way of closing, there are any number of processes & procedures of law that will be deliberately circumvented by the developers (including the thousands of the most successful & devious lawyers in the signatory nations) of the treaties/’arrangements’ with provisions for secretly increasing the abuses in perpetuity.

And, given the severe blow that the treaties/’arrangements’ are giving to our ‘democracies’ it may be worth repeating yet again,

‘What the TREATY of VERSAILLES was to the 20th century PALES in COMPARISON to the TPP, CETA, C-CIT, NAFTA, et al, in the 21st’.

And, how will YOUR submission to YOUR highest court IMPROVE upon The Submission that is presently before The Supreme Court of Canada?

By way of closing, I look forward to reading about your thoughts, your questions, your feelings, your improvements, etc., & those of your readers, regarding the enclosed.

If you should have any more questions or problems with this issue, &/or, any other, I can be contacted at the enclosed numbers & addresses.

David E.H. Smith
– Researcher
– ‘Qui tam…’
For more Information & Questions re; The Relationship between Human (Nature) Rights & Economics by way of the TTIP, the CET Agreement, TPP, C-CI Treaty, et al, and The WAD Accord
see; davidehsmith.wordpress.com
Please consider sharing the enclosed information & questions with 10 friends who will share it with 10 others…


30) TPP, TTIP, CETA & other Global Treaties/”Arrangements’; ‘The Three Card Monte’. How long have Global Corporate Associates been ‘Passing’ Legislation in Anticipation of Suing Once Ratified? ‘Trickle’ Up & Out Economics.

Americans, Japanese, et al, look forward to working with Savvy Slave Trading Malaysians & Slick Cultural ‘Genociding’ Canadians. ‘But, we didn’t know’.

Will Pope Francis & other leaders Intercede with Prayer against PM Harper, Corporate Canada, The Canadian Establishment, et al, for Continuing to Blame & Punish those who are continuing to be Deprived of the Due Diligence Info and Continuing its Cultural Genocide? Protecting the Human Rights of Unborn Native Canadians, et al.
Traditional Canadian Parties Demanding Supplicance to Corporate Canada & its Global Corporate Assocs. is an unholy sin?

Canada’s Big 3 Traditional Parties tell Voters; For NO to Global Treaties/”Arrangements’ just VOTE for the GREEN Party.
ANTI-Globalists (GREENs) PROHIBITED from ‘Corp.Can.’s Election’ DEBATE…

But, will the lil’ guy get 10 years to read, consider, discuss & improve upon (with lawyers paid by Global Corporate Assocs.)?
by David E.H. Smith, ‘Qui tam…’

After New Zealand’s PM admitted that medicines will cost more, have the citizens of New Zealand & other TPP nations also noticed similar moves like Canadian Prime Minister Harper below? ‘To help pay for the harmless taxpayers ‘guilty transgressions’ against Global Corporations in Canada, Prime Minister Harper has recently cut the funding for health care by $36 billion dollars’. (please article below)

There is absolutely no ethical reason for hyping a mountain of corporate ‘arrangements’ to screw the harmless, lil’ guy by espousing the legitimate benefits of reducing tariffs & referring to the arrangements as ‘trade’ treaties?

The fact of the matter is the TPP, TTIP, CETA & other Global Treaties/”Arrangements’ are not about how much trade, but, who the signatory corporations prefer to trade with & how to ‘Vichy’ their profits while ‘undermining’ the AIIB, et al. And, if one understands the basic economic law that
there is only a finite amount of global value & that it does not grow, or, shrink, it just moves around, then, one might be able to understand that the TTIP, CETA & the other Global Treaties/’Arrangements’ are the means for just such moves; they are just attempts to move the value of the signatory nations to the (‘global’) corporations that are presently located in these nations. These ‘moves’ only make economic sense if the value that is moved to the global corporations is at the expense of the non-shareholders (via ‘their’ governments), whether the non-shareholders are citizens of the signatory nations, or, not.

And, while the aforementioned reorganization will cause an increase in employment in some sectors of the signatory Global Corporations it will be off-set by:
1) the devaluation of the operational costs as jobs move to the signatory nations with the lowest cost of employment,
2) the decrease of jobs in other sectors which will be lost entirely to non-signatory nations which have un competitively low wages.

Other ‘secret’ cost shifts from the corporations to the harmless, individual tax payers include:
1) the systematic move from one corporation suing another corporation, to both corporations suing the harmless taxpayers in secret (‘Death-Star’) Tribunals; but, with no defense, nor, appeals for the harmless taxpayers (see; ‘The MERKEL Letter’*),
2) the prohibition of governments to sue the signatory corporations; ie. what was previously (prior to the treaties) illegal, &/or, unethical is now ‘legal’ in the new jurisdiction of the cyber Tribunals (the U.S., et al, Corporations that have craved for Tort Reform are getting Tort Abolishment),
3) the provisions to make more secret add-ons at later dates with no public consultations,
4) et al.

To help pay for the harmless taxpayers ‘guilty transgressions’ against Global Corporations in Canada, Prime Minister Harper has recently cut the funding for health care by $36 billion dollars. Not only do these funds reward the Global Corporations (to pay for present-future punitive developmental costs, penalties, etc.), but, it gives the Corporations the funds to purchase national health care systems of Canada & the other signatory corporate states whose health care functions are being deliberately exacerbated in anticipation of the secret intent of the Treaties/’Arrangements’; acquisition of national health care & pharmaceutical systems. Other public services are similarly being made vulnerable in preparation for corporate take-overs. Surprisingly, the Canadian province of Saskatchewan seems to be particularly resilient to the pressures from Corporate Canada & its Global Corporate Associates, at least for now.

However, where the real money is to be made in the secret
Treaties/’Arrangements’ is not in the ‘three card Monte’ (ie. Zero net effect) trade area of the treaties, but, in the moves in finance. Perhaps the most significant move here is from a system that is barely accountable in open courts, such as:
1) the money laundering of HSBC, et al, on behalf of drug & terrorist groups,
2) Enron’s unregulated (fraud, insider trading**, etc.) manipulation of electrical power-services,
3) the unregulated & fraud induced (Chase bank; ‘fine before no crime, nor, time’, et al) melt-down of Wall St. in the 2008 (the ‘tactical probe’ before the ‘invasion’ of the Global Treaties/’Arrangements’)
4) et al,
to a system of secret tribunal ‘arrangements’. In other words, the illegal practices that were barely detectable due to the deliberate underfunding of the regulators
the political interference of the investigations by the Dept. of Justice (U.S.),
will enable the practices of HSBC, Enron, Chase, et al, to not only live on but, expand exponentially & internationally.

The advocates of the Global corporate economy can warmly point out that the lil’ guy will no longer have to pay for the costs of the governments regulating, policing, investigating, prosecuting & incarcerating (?) financial felonies & misdemeanors as these duties will fall under the new cyber-jurisdiction.

This ‘cost savings’ begs the questions:
1) what are the various different ways that these costs savings can be made contractually binding in an agreed upon reduction of taxes of the harmless taxpayers,
2) what constitutes a ’good corporate citizen’ in the post treaty ratification world
3) how many pieces of legislation have Corporate Canada & its Global Associates encouraged, sponsored, &/or, paid a consideration to have passed in anticipation of suing the harmless individual taxpayers for windfall profits after the Treaties/’Arrangements’ have been ratified &
4) et al?

And, finally, it may be regrettable that nowhere in the discussion of the flurry of Global Treaties/’Arrangements’ has there been any mention about what will be the destabilizing consequences for the signatories due to;
1) the deliberate deprivation of information (particularly, Canada, re; The W.A.D. Accord & its Compensation) that is increasing the unrealistic expectations of the other signatories, potential signatories, et al,
2) the signatories making geopolitical side deals with non-members which have the appearance of being at the expense of the other corporations of the treaty signatories
3) et al?
DEHS *** For more on ‘The MERKEL Letter’, see; ‘The MERKEL (Chancellor of Germany) Letter’; To Sue, or, Be Sued’ ; excerpts from “The Submission’ to The Supreme Court of Canada;
The SHAREHOLDERS and corporates Canada, America, the EU, the Trans Pacific nations, et al v. the harmless non shareholders of the Canada, both; Native & non-Native).
For more on Insider Trading, see; ‘INSIDER TRADING; TPPartnership, CETA & C-CITreaty TRIBUNALS Need to be SECRET; Corporate Canada fears China may Blow “Arrangements” between Can. Lobbyists’ Clients & Parties’ Executives (re; The W.A.D. Accord*)?’
Also see; TPP, TTIP, CETA, Global Treaties/’Arrangements’ & Sovereignty
at davidehsmith.wordpress.com

For more Information & Questions re; The Relationship between Human (Nature) Rights & Economics by way of the TTIP, the CET Agreement, TPP, C-CI Treaty, et al, and The WAD Accord
see; davidehsmith.wordpress.com
Please consider sharing the enclosed information & questions with 10 friends who will share it with 10 others…