10) The UN’s SR, Mr. ANAYA; ”IGNORAMUS et IGNORABIMUS”; “ABORIGINAL CANADIANS, INFO DEPRIVATION, & The Growing GLOBAL CORPORATE ECONOMY”

Re; (the) your May 23,2014 article entitled ” ‘Dramatic Contradictions’: James Anaya’s report on dismal living conditions of Canada’s First Nations” by Ms. P Palmeter, there may be several reasons why the UN envoy on Aboriginal affairs, Mr. Anaya, & others, seem to be repeating previously stated positions yet again. Some of the reasons that your potential,
new readers, both Native & non Native Canadians, may not have had the opportunity to consider some of the issues are:
1) and, at the risk of repeating myself to those who have had to the opportunity to study the significance of the Latin phrase:
“Ignoramus et ignorabimus” (Latin): “We don’t know & we will not know,”,
the phrase raises two important due diligence points regarding Mr. Anaya’s statements.
a) he may not know about the recent developments effecting Aboriginal Canadians; in other words, by Mr. Anaya not knowing about the recent developments, he may not be competent to discuss information that he is being deprived of regarding these recent developments
&
b)
by saying that “I will not know” about the recent developments regarding Aboriginal Canadians, Mr. Anaya may be insincere. The determination of his sincerity may be ascertained if one can determined that he did/does “know” about the recent developments. Regardless, once the aforementioned determination is made, it might be worth asking Mr.
Anaya, et al, about his lack of willingness to share the information that he may be depriving the most vulnerable (95% – 99%) Native & non Natives community members (the most “vulnerables”) of, both; foreign & domestic.

The response of Mr. Anaya, et al, about his lack of willingness to share the information is important in that it can help the most “vulnerables”, et al, determine the intent of Mr. Anaya,
et al. That is to say; is Mr. Anaya, et al, depriving the most “vulnerables”, et al, of the information part of an arrangement intended to keep some of the other parties from benefiting from the information, such as; the “coveted” foreign investor, as a means of, for example, effecting the value of a company’s future IPO (Initial Public Offering), etc. as a consequence of the Canada – China Investment Treaty & other trade agreements?

Perhaps, the most significant point here is, if you do not ask your representatives (journalists), et al, what they know & are willing to share, you will not know, &/or, you may become a victim of someone who maybe leading you to “believe” his various different scenarios that will not help you quantify how much it will cost you. Nor, will he tell you how much he, et al, will be making as a consequence of you making nothing, & your deprivation of the due diligence information. On the other hand, perhaps he will give you a hope that you may make something in the future if you remain uninformed.

Therefore, find enclosed the Oct. 5, 2013 letter to Mr. Anaya, et al, regarding the link between:
the deprivation of the information (for example; the criteria for
ascertaining the health & robustness of a Native Canadian
community’s economy that is embodied in The W.A.D. Accord, aka; “The
Australian Question”)
and
the unconscionably high rates of suicides, etc.

Once you & your readers have ascertained that Mr. Anaya, et al, has received the Oct. 5, 2013 letter you will be able to ask other questions, et al, & then, draw your own conclusions. (Google; “The W.A.D. Accord”, &/or, “The Australian Question”)

On the other hand, after you have made some of your own conclusions about the
deprivation of the information, et al, you & your readers may wonder what is the significance of the aforementioned deprivation of information, not only in regard to The WAD Accord/suicides,
but,
in regard to the growing global corporate need to control the financing, the access, the development, manufacturing, distribution, etc. of the natural resources that are continuing to be found in Canada, et al, by way of the arrangements in The C-CITreaty, Eu CETA, TPPartnership, NAFTA, et al. Many of these natural resources are on Native land, or,
accessible via Native land, &/or, land that has yet to be negotiated.

Therefore, one of the questions is; who is going to pay The Compensation that is embodied in The WAD Accord as a consequence of the aforementioned deprivation of the information? As it presently stands, corporate Canada & perhaps, others, may want The
Compensation, the “net” amount, to be paid by the NON shareholders. Another question; what are the various ways that corporate Canada can use the proceeds of the aforementioned arrangements’ (Treaties/Agreements) secret tribunal’s punitive damages, paid by the non shareholders, in order to pay for the costs of foreign & domestic lobbying and development while also using the funds to increase the value of its dividends &
stocks?

And, who “qualifies” as a NON shareholder is another interesting question. For instance, the recent push to turn Aboriginal communities into municipalities makes the communities even more vulnerable as these Native communities can then be sued by the corporations that are the signatories of the NAFTAgreement, the C-CI Treaty, the EU-Canada CETAgreement, the TPPartnership, et al, if Native municipalities seem to be preventing the aforementioned
corporations (& their boards of directors, including “The Canadians”, & their shareholders) of the profits that can be derived from the development of the aforementioned natural resources.

(Google; “The TERMINATION PLAN” for Native Canadians, et al; The COUNTER
OFFER REFERENDUMS; The WAD Accord, The Notification of C-CI Treaty
(CETA & TPP), The Termination Plan, The T.P. Counter Offer, et al
and
“Death of First Nations; Birth of ‘Sue-able’ First Municipalities”)

And, while some have suggested that it may be regrettable that the “net” costs of developing, management, administrating, policing & adjudicating these arrangements (Treaties, Agreements, et al), have been, & will continue to be paid for by the non shareholders, including the unconscionably high rate of suicides (“acceptable collateral damage” as the cost of maintaining “peace, order & good government”), the present & future liabilities & punitive damages (the “net” amounts) awarded by the secret treaty/agreement tribunals (“The Star Chamber”) will be paid for by the citizens of the municipalities who are allegedly “depriving” the corporations & their shareholders from the potential profits derived from the development of the aforementioned natural resources
&
the non shareholders, in general, through further cuts to existing programs & services (education & health care) , transfer payments, etc.

By way of closing, the above information raises some interesting questions as to who knows what & is willing to share it with the 95% – 99% of the populations of the countries that are effected by the aforementioned arrangements (Treaties, Agreements, Partnerships, etc.).
For instance; what has corporate China learned & has proposed as a consequence of President Xi Jinping (China) being served with “The Notification of the Preexisting Challenge to The China – Canada Investment Treaty”
versus
what corporate Canada has learned & is willing to share about the information that Prime Minister Harper (Canada) has received in the cover letter enclosed with “The Notification…” that he, et al, has been served with?

(Google; “President Xi Jinping; You’ve Been Served…” and “PM Harper; You’ve Been
Served…”)

What did the Chinese Minister of State Security, MSS, suggest about “renditioning” the aforementioned information for CSIS (Canadian Security Intelligence Service) in a politically deniable manner & thereby, exculpate corporate China from paying any amount for The Compensation?
(Google; “The C-CI TREATY; CHINA’S KIND HELP, from
its MINISTRY of STATE SECURITY (MSS) may be ACCEPTED by the CANADIAN
SECURITY INTELLIGENCE SERVICE (CSIS) IF…there is ADEQUATE PLAUSIBLE
POLITICAL DENIABILITY”).

Similarly, how much of “The Threat Assessment; CSIS” did the head, et al, of CSIS, &/or, others share with the “coveted” foreign investor, President Xi Jinping, Mr. Geng Huichang (MSS), et al.
(Google; “The Threat Assessment; CSIS”)

And, in regard to Mr. Anaya, which of the UN general secretaries, former & present, are more conversant with The WAD Accord & its Compensation, etc. in the context of the growing global corporate economy? And, which countries’ representatives to the UN are also conversant?

How much of the aforementioned information, et al, have your municipal, &/or First Nations communities, provincial, federal representatives, provided to you willingly & knowledgeably?

And, how anxious are Canadians, et al, to move to a sovereign Quebec, &/or, other jurisdictions that regard the contributing factor to the aforementioned suicides, etc. as inhumane & unethical, in order to exculpate themselves of their contribution toward The Compensation & other hidden costs & liabilities associated with the aforementioned arrangements (Treaty/Agreements)?
Is corporate Canada trying to off-load their liability for exacerbating the situation by trying to get China, et al, to pay the entire Compensation as a part of China’s “hidden” cost of becoming beholden to corporate Canada & its secret arrangements?
(davidehsmith.wordpress.com., or, Google; “SECRET C-CITreaty & CETA TRIBUNALS* are INSIDER TRADING; corp. Canada tells China to “Hit the Road” if Chinese style anti-corruption Blows “Arrangements” between Can. Lobbyists’ Clients & Parties’ Executives (W.A.D. Accord**)? NON Shareholders
HAVE TO pay”.)

And, finally, getting back to the comments regarding racism & polite “tolerance”, you & your readers might consider:
1) writing CSIS & sharing what you learn from them about their comments regarding our correspondences about “despots & diaspora” as it pertains to Native Canadians, &/or, non Native Canadians
&
2) writing the “coveted” Chinese investor who said:

“It’s not that we are racist when it comes to dealing with Canadians,
it’s just that we can’t stand the way that you suck up to us”.

Do you, the editor of Rabble, Ms. Palmeter &/or your potential readers in China, Europe, the Trans Pacific nations & North America think that the “coveted” investor was referring to the sucking up by corporate Canada,
or,
by “our”/your political leaders/salesmen?

And, finally, is it conceivable, possible, probable, &/or, likely that some Native leaders may also be benefiting from depriving their community members of the aforementioned information? And, do you understand how The W.A.D. Accord can be used to ascertain which leaders, both; Native & non Native, are the deprivers of the information? And, do you understand the significance of this determination?

And, how much of the enclosed information was Iran’s Mr. Mohammad Javad Larijani Sec-Gen High Council of Human Rights willing, &/or, able to confirm?

I look forward to reading about your understanding of the above & enclosed material. Similarly, I look forward to reading about the various different ways that you want/need to start getting the aforementioned information & questions to the most vulnerable community members for their humble consideration, discussion & sharing in forums that are free of retributions & recriminations.

Sincerely,

David E.H. Smith
– Researcher
– “Qui tam…”

*******                                                                                                                                                     Your DONATIONS for the ongoing research & the dissemination of the relevant information will be gratefully accepted & can be sent to;                                                                                               David E.H. Smith, 2173 Bradford Ave., Sidney, BC, Canada. V8L 2C8
*******
To SHARE Information & Questions re; The Relationship between Human
(Nature) Rights & Economics in 1) the C-CI Treaty, the CET Agreement, TPP, et al, and 2) Native Canadian Treaties via The WAD Accord
and the List of RECENT ARTICLES, LETTERS & NOTIFICATIONS by DEHS.
see; davidehsmith.wordpress.com
********
Oct. 5, 2013
Mr. Anaya, the Office the United Nations Special Rapporteur
on the rights of indigenous peoples, et al;

Regarding your meeting with the government of Canada in, or, around Oct. 15, 2013 concerning the rights of Native Canadians, I would like to inform you that there have been several developments since I last wrote to you regarding:
1) the relationship between:
a) the unconscionably high rates of despair, disenchantment, suicides, unemployment,
poverty, etc. that are found in many of the First Nations communities across Canada (Please see; ”
and
b) the deprivation of the information to the most vulnerable members of the aforementioned communities by the government of Canada, et al
and
2) the deprivation of the most vulnerable members of the information & questions that are embodied in the comprehensive version of The W.A.D. Accord including the details of The Compensation in The Accord to the most vulnerable members for their information
deprivation.

For a summary of the above information, please see the articles below entitled;
1) “HELP is on the WAY?”
and
2) the less comprehensive version of “The W.A.D. Accord” including The Compensation.

Since sending you this information there have been more recent developments. Please see
below the information & questions in the letters below entitled:

3) “Prime Minister HARPER; YOU’VE been SERVED with “NOTIFICATION of
Preexisting CHALLENGE to the CANADA – CHINA INVESTMENT TREATY”
and
4) “TARGETING 95% – 99% CANADIANS (the Most Vulnerable Native…”.

Would you please acknowledge that you have received this letter and the enclosed information & questions.

And, now that you have received the new information, I, et al, would also hope that you would follow up the new questions by making sure that the government of Canada, corporate Canada, et al, are aware that we are all very concerned with their program for starting to get this most simple & most basic information (& questions) to the most
vulnerable members of the aforementioned communities, et al, for their humble consideration, improvements, questions, alternatives, etc. in forums where there is no fear of recriminations, or, retributions.

Sincerely,

David E.H. Smith
– Researcher
– “Qui tam…”

*********
1)
“NATIVE SUICIDES LINKED TO INFO. DEPRIVATION”
HELP IS ON THE WAY?
(CAN)- Re; the NUNAVUT & NESKANTAGA First Nation’s high rate of SUICIDES.
After discussing with a PSYCHOLOGIST (Native), et al, the relationship BETWEEN:
the DEPRIVATION of the most vulnerable Native community members, et al, of the simplest & most basic information, such as the information in The W.A.D. Accord (aka; “The Australian Question”)
and
the high rates of:
1) SUICIDES,
2) despair,
3) disenchantment,
4) unemployment,
5) poverty,
6) etc.,
that are found in many Native communities, et al, across Canada,
the PSYCHOLOGIST CONCURRED.

I have subsequently shared some of the aforementioned information, et al, with, &/or, have had the information & questions improved by, amongst others:
1) senior politicians & bureaucrats; both, federal & provincial, Canadian, et al,
2) the relevant lobbyists’ clients & the executives of the political parties operating in Canada,
3) the “coveted” foreign investor, et al,
4) the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
&
5) et al.

If you are interested in utilizing the aforementioned information to minimize, &/or, ELIMINATE the aforementioned major contributing factor to the SUICIDES, etc,
&/or,
have questions regarding the basis for The Compensation (similar to the compensation re; the Residential Schools, except larger, et al) to the most vulnerable community members, et al, for being deprived of the aforementioned simplest & most basic information,
then,
you might consider contacting the above groups & individuals in order to obtain some of
the information that is The W.A.D. Accord, etc.,
then,
contacting me by mail at:
David E.H. Smith, 2173 Bradford Ave., Sidney, B.C. CANADA. V8L 2C8.

By way of closing, does the information in this letter & the information in The WAD Accord belong to you, or, to the community members?
And, what do the psychologists that the Nunavut & Neskanataga, et al, are utilizing know about the aforementioned relationship? And, do they concur, or, not?

How much of the enclosed information & questions was Iran’s Mr. Mohammad Javad Larijani, Sec-General High Council Human Rights able, &/or, willing to confirm.

Sincerely,

David E.H. Smith
– Researcher
– “Qui tam…”                                                                                                                                    *******                                                                                                                                                     Your DONATIONS for the ongoing research & the dissemination of the relevant information will be gratefully accepted & can be sent to;                                                                                               David E.H. Smith, 2173 Bradford Ave., Sidney, BC, Canada. V8L 2C8
*******
To SHARE Information & Questions re; The Relationship between Human
(Nature) Rights & Economics in 1) the C-CI Treaty, the CET Agreement, TPP, et al, and 2) Native Canadian Treaties via The WAD Accord
and the List of RECENT ARTICLES, LETTERS & NOTIFICATIONS by DEHS.
see; davidehsmith.wordpress.com
******
Please consider sharing the enclosed information & questions with 10 members of your family, friends, associates in order that they can use the due diligence info to make more informed decision about their families’ financial planning, & then they can share it with 10 others…
******

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s