TABLE of CONTENTS

37) EXCERPTS #2 from ‘The SUBMISSION to The SUPREME COURT OF CANADA;         The SHAREHOLDERS & CORPORATIONS of CHINA, AMERICA, THE TRANS-PACIFIC NATIONS, THE EU, CANADA, E.T AL                                                                                               V.                                                                                                                                                                 The ‘HARMLESS’ CANADIAN Non-SHAREHOLDERS (Voters/Taxpayers) of Canada, et al, Both; NATIVE & Non NATIVE’.                                                                                                                            

36) BASIS for INVESTMENT LITIGATION; SUING the GLOBAL ECONOMY.

35) The ‘EMPIRE’* STRIKES BACK against Huge Indirect Taxes to pay (‘Death-Star’-Chamber) Tribunals’ Punitive Penalties? *the ‘harmless’ citizens of the Anti-Global Corporate Economy.

1) EXCERPTS #1 from ‘The SUBMISSION’ to The SUPREME COURT of CANADA;                       The SHAREHOLDERS, corporates CANADA, AMERICA, EUROPE, CHINA, The TRANS-PACIFIC NATIONS, et al,                                                                                                                      v.                                                                                                                                                               the ‘harmless’ non-shareholders (Voters/Taxpayers) of Canada, both; Native & non Native, et al.

2) ‘The MERKEL (Chancellor of Germany) Letter; To Sue, or, Be Sued?’ 

34) TPP; Japan; ‘The Submission’ to The Supreme Court of Canada paves the way for Expanding & Improving the basis of the Yamada led ‘Sword & Shield’ Counter attack Suit against the Japanese gov’t, et al. TPP & other Global Corporate Treaties/’Arrangements’ signatory gov’ts. in Conflict of Interest.

33) ISDS; The Death of Democracy & Sovereignty, or, an Opportunity to Sue Global Corporate Economy & their Governments?

32) Why Native Canadians Might consider Helping Grassroots citizens of TPP nations, the EU, China, et al, to Sue Corporate Canada & its Global Corporate Assocs.

31) TPP & Global Treaties/’Arrangements’; Sovereignty vs. Cyber ‘Justice’.

30) TPP, TTIP, CETA & other Global Treaties/”Arrangements’; ‘The Three Card Monte’. How long have Global Corporate Associates been ‘Passing’ Legislation in Anticipation of Suing Once Ratified? ‘Trickle’ Up & Out Economics.

29) ‘Tired of your Political Representatives’ “Non-Answer Responses” (Talking Points)? A SIMPLE DIAGNOSTIC TEST of your DEMOCRACY.) – part 1

28) TPP, Global Treaties/’Arrangements’ & Sovereignty.

27) The European Union’s Commission’s receipt of: “The NOTIFICATION of Preexisting CHALLENGE to the EU – Canada Comprehensive Economic & Trade Agreement (CETA)”; EU may consider “Renditioning Info” as Condition of CETA Deal to Minimize “Unethical & Inhumane” Arrangements between Canadian lobbyists’ clients/parties’ executives; CHINA Unprotected with C-CITreaty?

26) TPP & GLOBAL TREATIES; But, If Not PUTIN; ‘The WHITE KNIGHT’…

25) C-51 ‘Anti Terrorism’ Bill; Native Canadians, et al, vs. corporate Canada & The Global Corporate Economy?

24) CORPORATE TPP’s, CETA’s, et al, “SECRET” VULNERABILITIES. Which NON Shareholders WILL QUALIFY FOR EXEMPTIONS?

23) The SUPREME COURT of CANADA; The SHAREHOLDERS, corporates CANADA, U.S.A., the EU, CHINA, The TRANS PACIFIC 

NATIONS, et al, VS. the harmless non shareholders of Canada, both; Native & non Native. Suing The Global Corporate Economy.

22) But, will CHINA support “PUTIN (BRICS); The WHITE KNIGHT”?

21) INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE, or, INTELLIGENT SHARING; The Edge, or, Illusion for Who?

20) More of PM Harper’s corporate Alberta (‘Canada’) trying to Beholden the Big, Bad Dragon & Why CSIS’s Fadden Had to Go.

19) “OPPOSITION” Sucking Up to EU; CETA & C-CI Treaty DELAYED for IMPROVEMENTS?

18) An OPEN LETTER to Canadian NON SHARE HOLDERS (both; Native & non Native) & POTENTIAL, FOREIGN INVESTORS in Canadian Natural Resource Development, et al, re; NAFTA, C-CIT, CETA, TPP, et al, SECRET TRIBUNALS.

17) “The CETAgreement, TPPartnership, et al, SHAREHOLDERS’ (& corporate) Bill of Rights”. What the TREATY of VERSAILLES was to the 20th century PALES in COMPARISON to the TPP, CETA, C-CIT, NAFTA, et al, in the 21st.

16) The EU’s Acknowledgement of The NOTIFICATION of CHALLENGE to CETA.

15) “CONSIDERATIONS” paid to ALL Parties to PROMOTE TPP, C-CIT & CETA “Arrangements” &/or to LIMIT “OPPOSITION” as per NAFTA, et (see; The WAD Accord)?

14) The C-CI TREATY; CHINA’S KIND HELP, from its MINISTRY of STATE SECURITY (MSS) may be ACCEPTED by the CANADIAN SECURITY INTELLIGENCE SERVICE (CSIS) IF… …there is ADEQUATE PLAUSIBLE POLITICAL DENIABILITY.

13) The THREAT ASSESSMENT; CSIS (Canadian Security Intelligence Service), et al, re; C-CITreaty, CETAgreement,TPPartnership, NAFTA, et al. Edited; Jly., 2017, included; Intro. & The 3rd Party Letter.

12) Using The WAD Accord to Improve, &/or, Eliminate the C-CITreaty (FIPA) & your (GREEN Party) letter to me.

11) President Xi Jinping; YOU’VE BEEN SERVED with “The NOTIFICATION of the Preexisting CHALLENGES to C-CITreaty”, et al.

10) The UN’s SR, Mr. ANAYA; ”IGNORAMUS et IGNORABIMUS”; “ABORIGINAL CANADIANS, INFO DEPRIVATION, & The Growing GLOBAL CORPORATE ECONOMY”.

9) PM HARPER; YOU’VE Been SERVED with; “NOTIFICATION of Preexisting CHALLENGE to the C-CITreaty (FIPPA), the CETAgrement & The TPPartnership “.

8) “NATIVE SUICIDES LINKED TO INFO DEPRIVATION; The INHUMANELY HIGH RATES of Native SUICIDES in Canada. HELP IS ON THE WAY?” (Crimes against Humanity).

7) The W.A.D. ACCORD; INFO DEPRIVATION cORP. CANADA USES GOV’T to DEFRAUD harmless non shareholders.

6) The SUPREME COURT of CANADA; Reopening All Treaties to Embrace The W.A.D. ACCORD & Its COMPENSATION; “Tsilhqot’in Decision”; JAMES BAY TREATY, et al .

5) “WELL, YOU SHOULD HAVE KNOWN”. – U.S. President George H.W. Bush; NAFTA. TPP, CETA, C-CIT, et al, NEXT?

4) SECRET TPPartnership, C-CITreaty & CETA TRIBUNALS are INSIDER TRADING; corp. Canada fears China may Blow “Arrangements” between Can. Lobbyists’ Clients & Parties’ Executives (W.A.D. Accord*)?

3) HUMAN NATURE; How Cultures & Traditions can be used to explain Bullying & Info Deprivation to Protect the Power of “Death-Pots”.

Advertisements

37) EXCERPTS #2 to ‘The SUBMISSION to The SUPREME COURT of CANADA; The SHAREHOLDERS & Corporations of CHINA, America, the Trans-Pacific nations, the EU, Canada, et al v. The ‘harmless’ Canadian NON-shareholders, et al, both; Native & non Native’. For The FULL SUBMISSION, see; The Supreme Court of Canada

Letter to The Justices of The Supreme Court of Canada Continued; “Will The Court Consider…”; Toward more Informed Opinions & Conclusions

In conclusion, while I do not want to displease The Court, nor, do I want The Court’s displeasure directed at me, or/my research, it is important that in the interest of clarity, to pose some further questions regarding a typical situation that speaks to the intent of the “Arrangements” of corporate Canada, its associates, its shareholders, et al.

 Following Mr. Paul Palango’s premises in his book “Dispersing the Fog” to a logical conclusion, that is to say; as a consequence of;

1) the government of Canada’s  (& thus, its associated lobbyists, the party executives, and now, its global corporate associates, et al), the interference, interruptions, termination & “deliberate under funding”, etc. of investigations of corporation Canada, et al, by way of the political relationship between the Government of Canada & the top leaders of the RCMP, et al,

and

2) United State’s:

A) “renegining” on the decisions by the dispute reconciliators against the U.S. versus Canada in the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)

&

p. 81

B) the symbolical chastising of Wall Street’s (U.S.A.) investment community as a consequence of its probe to check the lack of consequences for the international impact that the Wall Street Investment “Meltdown” and the Goldman Sachs malfeasance which may still be detrimentally effecting economies around the world, including Canada,

then, the above actions &, in some cases lack of action, has encouraged & emboldened the leaders of corporate Canada, et al, & its shareholders, et al, to further protect itself & its global associates from its Canadian liabilities, responsibilities, etc.  by creating off-shore companies as a means of associating with their limited liability companies that operate in Canada, &/or, other signatory nations and is presently being legitimized by the aforementioned:

i) Canada – China Investment Treaty,

ii) Trans Pacific Partnership,

iii) EU – Canada Comprehensive Economic & Trade Agreement

&

iv) et al.

 

Corporate Canada has caused Canadian laws to be created for the prima fascie purposes (intent) of serving corporate Canada’s internationalist interests, not as “good corporate citizens”, but, in their intersts of cooperating with their associates that are based in other countries in order to cross sue (by way of The Tribunals) the NON shareholders in all of the signatory countries.

As it was noted in the Synopsis, page 7, to the article entitled “Native Suicides Linked to Information Deprivation”, the United States served notice around, or, about the 1980’s to other countries that American based corporations that are also operating in other countries, would no longer be a “good corporate citizens” of its host countries. That is to say that these American corporations would follow American economic policies & would not necessarily support the economic policies of the host countries.

The significance of American corporations becoming “NON good corporate citizens” while operating in other countries becomes apparent when one considers that Canadian corporations, by way of their representatives in the government of Canada, & the other signatories of the aforementioned “arrangements”, are implimenting a means whereby they can become “non good corporate citizens” of, not only the host countries that they operate in (&/or, where the corporations would like to operate in), they are becoming by way of the “arrangements”, “non good corporate citizens” of their home counties, as well.

These laws become more significance when looked at in the context of the aforementioned tribunals for the new Treaty, Agreement(s), Partnership “arrangements”. These “arrangements” enable corporate Canada & their new global corporate associates

p. 82

to access their reciprocal “recovery pool” of the potential profits that the collabrative, global shareholders could derived from the development of the natural resources that are continuing to be found in Canada, et al, by enabling the corporations to sue the harmless, Canadian NON shareholders, et al, by way of the government of Canada, et al.

Similarly, corporate Canada & its shareholders can enjoy the financial benefits from the reciprocity of being enabled to sue the NON shareholders of other countries by way of the collaborative governments which are also willing, &/or, anxious to partake in the financial rewards derived from the victimizing of the harmless NON shareholders who are living in the other signatory countries.

These statements raise some very intesting questions for the Court, such as:

given that the tribunals are secret, just how frivolous can the “decisions” of The Tribunals get in order to obtain punitive; damages, fines, penalties, etc., before a “frivolous” decision offends the Supreme Court of Canada, et al?

And, given the pattern of “political” interference, interuption, termination of and

deliberate underfunding of police investigations, etc. that Mr. Paul Palango has documented in “Dispersing the Fog”, can the Court compel the government:

a) to cease & desist in its interference, etc.,

b) to adequately fund investigations, particularly when the investigations are into the somewhat obscured means that were, &/or, are continuing to be employed by the lobbyists, et al, of corporate Canada & the executives of the political parties that are operating in Canada, to manifest the aforementioned “arrangements” within Canada & with its global economic associates (ie. investigations into how the “arrangements” are causing, &/or, have caused a secret coup d’état” of the democratratic process in Canada, et al)?

Are there existing laws, &/or, remedies that can adequately protect, &/or, compensate the harmless NON shareholders that can render him/her whole? Or, is that the intent of the secret “arrangements”, ie. too ensure that no laws have been passed, &/or, will be passed that would make their secret “arrangements”, immediately recognizable as being “illegal” once the “arrangements” have been ratified? Under what circumstances would

the Court act unilaterally in order ascertain the sincerity & competency of the direct and indirect financial beneficiaries of the “arrangements”.

How long will the victims, the NON shareholders, who have been already been harmed by the costs of the development of the “arrangements”, etc.

and

who will be penalized & who will be continued to be damaged by way of the on-going secret “arrangements” once the “arrangements” are ratified, have to suffer?

It may be regrettable that corporate Canada, et al, may feel justified with

p. 83

aforementioned harm as it may be outweighed by corporate Canada’s “wisdom”and its  benevolence for creating “some” non consensual jobs that the shareholders and their corporate leaders find so dangerous, &/or, beneath their dignity, that they have no intention of doing the jobs themselves, but, are “offering” the jobs to the NON shareholders, or, failing that, to immigrant workers from the aforementioned signatory countries?

Regardless, there are many financial advantages for corporate Canada & its associates

that necessitates the continuation of their secrecy. For instances; the secrecy enables the utilization of untraceable money (ie. legally, &/or, illegally gained money) by the signatories’ off-shore companies, by the Tribunals to sue the agreeable Government of Canada, et al, for the tax dollars of the deliberately uniformed (ie. information deprived), &/or, misinformed, harmless NON shareholding Canadian tax payers.

By utilizing unaccountable (secret) off shore goods & services ( particularly, over

insurances), such as; administrative & legal fees that the associated limited liability companies in the host countries might incur, enables corporate Canada, its associates and their shareholders to inflate their true costs and thereby, either minimizes the taxes that they pay to the host countries, or, can also be used as a means of receiving tax credits, job creation funds, economic development funds, et al, from the  NON shareholders via the agreeable, signatory host countries. Therefore, it is necessary that corporate Canada & its associates and their shareholders move & hide as much of their profits and “costs” off shore from the deliberately underfunded Canadian, et al, accountants, investigators & investigative organizations, such as; the RCMP and Revenue Canada.

In addition, the off-shore companies can sell its shares on the basis of the unfettered decisions of the signatories’ tribunals. Aren’t the off-shore companies which are protected by The Tribunals a very convenient method of laundering money, whereby the off-shore companies can use, & will be used by criminal enterprises in order to legitimize their proceeds, or, to pay for the corruption of government officials who are being paid directly,

or, via future considerations for their support, &/or, their lack of opposition to

the development & ratification of the superseding “arrangements”& enterprises? And, therefore, isn’t the purpose of the design & manifestion of the “arrangements” and its Tribunals, to facilitate a very large & secret criminal enterprise with some legitimate & semi-legitimate companies taking a very limited amount of the liability while placing almost all ofthe enterprises’ finances, accounting, profits, etc. beyond the jurisdiction of the government of Canada, &/or, The Court?

Isn’t the intent of the aforementioned enterprise to ensure that profits & expenditures will be remain hidden & can not be repatriated to Canada & other legitimate

p. 84

jurisdictions, and thus, the profits can not be frozen, or, seized during any investigation, &/or,

litigation,

or, used as damages, &/or, punitive damages, in unfavorable awards by way of The Court on behalf of judgements favoring the NON shareholders?

And, furthermore, by having the ownership of the assets that are to be used in the

devlopment & financing of the natural resources that are continuing to be found in Canada, off-shore, the assets & the interests of the signatory nations can be protected by foreign militaries which can prevent the seizing of its assets in Canada and the bulk of its assests that are off-shore, etc.?

Do the NON shareholders have to pay the aforementioned:

1) developmental costs of the “arrangements”

2) the penalties & damages

&

3) et al,

while they wait for a test case to be heard by The Court, and while corporate Canada, et al, becomes further emboldened, gains more momentum & further entrenches itself laterally into more financial institutions, etc., before The Court can step in?

And, finally, there are a number of other points that I am presently researching and developing. One of them, I will leave with you to consider and that is;

as corporate Canada, its associates, its shareholders, et al, appear to be intent upon:

1) maximizing the privilege of secrecy regarding their arms length control of the Canadian economy, et al, to conduct their:

A) project financing,

B) accounting,

C) administration,

D) procurment of goods & services; and

E) payment of costs, such as; salaries, bonuses, stock dividends, etc.

F) manufacturing

G) taxes

and

H) et al,

off-shore,

and thus, making it deliberately difficult for any, or, all of assests being forfeited

2) minimizing, &/or, eliminating their costs, liabilities, resposabilities, etc.

and

3) using the Tribunals as a means of raising funds, profits, etc. in order to recuperate what might otherwise might be legitimate, and/or, illegitimate costs of doing business, etc, aren’t corporate Canada, its associates, its shareholders, et al, indicating that they

p. 85

are, not only ,“non good citizens of Canada”, but, they are people and companies which are suggesting to The Court, et al, by way of their actions, that they do not want to be welcomed in Canada,

and thus,

the aforementioned “non good citizens of Canada” are indicating their desire to be treated by the NON shareholders, including the members of The Court, as persona non grata?

On the other hand, by demonstrating:

1) a willingness to repatriate the aforementioned benefits, assests, etc.

2) take ownership ofthe aforementioned liabilities, responsibilties, etc.,

3) by demonstrating a willingness to develop only environmentally friendly & sustainable businesses, industries & enterprises,

and

4) et al,

might be looked upon favorably by the NON shareholders and TheCourt.

By way of closing, I look forward to reading:

1) your acknowledgement of this letter & the enclosed

&

2) about The Court’s thoughts, its answers to the aforementioed questions that have been raised as a consequence of the research, The Court’s questions, its comments, its improvements, etc., regarding the above & the enclosed material.

And, does the enclosed information & questions give us the hope that it can assist The Court in understanding the aforementioned “arrangements” that are meant to:

1) circumvent the jurisdiction of the the Court,

2) punish, &/or, take unfair advantage of, by secret means, the NON shareholding Canadians, both; Natives & non Natives

&

3) et al?

Is there anything else that I can do, or, any other information that I might be able to provide The Court with in order to:

1) further demonstrate to The Court, et al, the damages, undue hardships, etc. that the aforementioned “arrangements” are causing, &/or, will cause to the NON shareholders

&

2) give The Court  a  greaterunderstanding of the necessity for asking the future litigents the “broader”questions in order to breach the secrecy of corporate Canada, et al, &

repair the damage that is being perpetrated upon the NON shareholders & the Canadian

version of “democracy”?

p. 86

As the secrecy & information deprivation may be claimed to be privileged by the protection of the relationship between a lawyer & his/her client, I would hope that the

The Court would take into consideration that the information that I am sharing with the Court has yet to be classified as “privileged”, or, protected in the interests of “national security”.

One of the questions that this statement has raised is; at what point in the commission of a crime, or, a non legal action, can the lawyer/client confidentiality be abused in order to facilitate the crime(s)? That is to say; at what point can the confidentiality be used as another form of deception by secrecy, & /or, deprivation of information (for the purposes of, amongst other things, minimizing/preventing due diligence investigations). And, at what point in the “privileged” crime is the aforementioned confidentiality between a lawyer and a client (or, a priest & a penitent) no longer “guaranteed”?

And, by providing the information to The Court it will hopefully help the members of the

Court to develop some questions for the representatives of corporate Canada, et al, that the Court might not otherwise have the knowledge to ask.

Furthermore, by providing the information to The Court it will cause corporate Canada:

1) to share corporate Canada’s understanding of the information that I am providing to The Court, with The Court, the most vulnerable Canadians, the non shareholders, et al,

and

2) to declare their intentions & financial information in the openness of The Court & the public, as opposed to their severely limiting the availability of their financial information, et al, to the secret (”Star Chamber”) Tribunals provided by the aforementioned “arrangements”.

Please note, that in providing the information in this submission to The Court I have tried to:

1) eliminate the use of characterizations

&

2) minimize the number of conclusions that I have made in order to leave it up to the Court to draw its own conclusions.

On the other hand, would it be presumptuous, &/or, impudent, if I asked The Court; could we agree that the enclosed material raises:

1) some very disturbing questions regarding the direction & intent of what the public may have previously referred to as the “good corporate citizens of Canada”,

and

the rights (particularly, the right to due diligence information) of the harmless NON shareholders vs. the shareholders & their global corporate leaders,

etc.,

2) some worisome questions regarding the changing interrelationships between

p. 87

economics  the “democratic” and the political process in Canada; ie. by moving the accountability & profits, etc. of corporate Canada off-shore to where the economic decisions will be removed from Canadian scrutiny, but, will continue to “de-sovereignize” Canada, etc.

and

3) some alarming questions regarding the usurping of the authority of The Court to adjudicate the adversarial positions between:

the corporations that are supported by the congress of the federal government of Canada & the enterprise of the global corporate economy via their Tribunals (their “courts”) & their international sanctions, etc.

and

the non shareholders,

in order to make the harmless NON shareholders whole again & compensate them as to be determined by The Court.

Regardless, I do hope that The Court will share with me some of its concerns with me regarding the above & the enclosed

and

will take the time to write to me & provide some hope that The Court intends to eliminate, &/or, minimize the basis the anxiety & fear that I, and so many Canadians are living with that I mentioned at the outset of this submission, other than to suggest that The Court will take the aforementioned information & questions under advisement, etc. at the appropriate time, such as when the Court may hear “the” relevant case that specifically addresses a particular piece of the aforementioned information, &/or, questions.

And, finally, I have endeavored to be concise in my writing & editing of this submission, but, the significance of the article’s content may have suffered as a consequence (Brevis esse laboro, obscurus fio; Latin). Similarly, I apologize for the lumpiness of some of the material, but, the necessity of sharing the enclosed information, questions, etc. is predicated upon the September 28, 2014 deadline when PM Harper has made public his intention to make a formal statement regarding “conclusion” to the EU – Canada CETAgreement.

Sincerely,

David E.H. Smith

– Researcher

– “Qui tam…”

***   

For EXCERPTS (#1) to ‘The SUBMISSION to The SUPREME COURT of CANADA;

The SHAREHOLDERS & Corporations of CHINA, America, the Trans-Pacific nations, the EU, Canada,  et al

v.

The ‘harmless’ Canadian NON-shareholders, et al, both; Native & non Native’.

see; davidehsmith.wordpress.com

For The FULL SUBMISSION, see; The Supreme Court of Canada

***                                                                                                                                 

Also, FULL Articlesee, 
36) ‘The BASIS for TREATIES/’ARRANGEMENTS’ LITIGATION as an INVESTMENT’;

davidehsmith.wordpress.com

***
Also see; 4) ‘INSIDER TRADING’ (The Need for Secrecy), davidehsmith.wordpress.com
***
Please consider sharing the enclosed information & questions with 10 members of your family, friends, associates in order that they can use the due diligence info to make more informed decision about their families‘ financial planning, & then they can share it with 10 others…

36) BASIS for INVESTMENT LITIGATION; SUING the GLOBAL ECONOMY.

 

BASIS for INVESTMENT LITIGATION; SUING the GLOBAL ECONOMY.

 

Re; ‘The Submission’ to The SUPREME COURT of CANADA:

‘The SHAREHOLDERS & Corporations of AMERICA, China, Canada, the EU, the

Trans-Pacific nations, et al
v.
the (harmless) Canadian NON shareholders, both; Native & non Native, et al’

 

1) The most vulnerable Aboriginal Canadian community members (95% – 99% of Aboriginal Canadians) are being deprived of the due diligence information regarding the criteria for ascertaining the health & robustness of an Native Canadian community’s economy.

 

2) A psychologist agreed that there is a relationship between the DEPRIVATION of the aforementioned information

and

the unconscionably high rates of SUICIDES, etc. that are found in many of the Aboriginal communities across Canada.

 

3) As a consequence of being deprived of the aforementioned information the most vulnerable Aboriginal Canadian community members are entitled to be COMPENSATED as per The W.A.D. Accord.

 

4) The most vulnerable NON Aboriginal Canadian community members (95% – 99% of NON Aboriginal Canadians) are being deprived of the information regarding the most vulnerable Aboriginal community members’ deprivation the aforementioned criteria

and

are forced to pay billions for the NON criteria based Native enterprises that are unhealthy & which prevent the most vulnerable Native community members from obtaining the benefits of their robust economies.

 

5) As a means of avoiding, &/or, diluting any, &/or, all of corporate Canada’s contribution to the aforementioned Compensation, corporate Canada is, & will continue, to pay considerations (lobbying) to the government of Canada via the executives of the political parties operating in Canada, et al, to promote the development of the superseding secret Tribunals of the present treaty ‘arrangements’ which have been designed to punitively punish the harmless Canadians NON shareholders, both; Native & NON Native, for allegedly encumbering corporate Canada, its associates and their shareholders (ie. The Global Corporate Economy) from the potential profits that might be derived from the development of the natural resources that are continuing to be found in Canada.

 

6) As corporate Canada & its shareholders, the government of Canada, the executives of the political parties that are operating in Canada, et al, are;

  1. A) depriving the harmless NON shareholders of Canada, the USA, the EU, the Trans Pacific nations, et al, of the risks associates with the treaty ‘arrangements’, such as; being forced to pay any & all of the punitive damages of the trade Tribunals,

&/or,

  1. B) depriving the harmless SHAREHOLDERS & corporate leaders of the USA, the EU, the Trans Pacific nations, et al, of the risks associates with the treaty ‘arrangements’, such as; being forced to pay any & all of the punitive damages of the trade Tribunals,

&/or,

  1. C) have not conducted their due diligence investigations of the risks involved with development of the superseding tribunals in order that corporate Canada, et al, can share their information with the NON shareholders, et al,

&/or,

  1. D) are preventing the RCMP, et al, from conducting investigations of the aforementioned risks by way of more political interference,

&

  1. E) et al,

 

corporate Canada & its shareholders, et al, are liable.

 

To Access the Relevant Reference Material:

  1. A) The W.A.D. Accord & its Compensation (aka; The Australian Question),

see; davidehsmith.wordpress.com

or,

Google.

  1. B) ‘The MERKEL (Chancellor of Germany) Letter; To Sue, or, Be Sued?’,

see; davidehsmith.wordpress.com

or,

Google.

  1. C) Excerpts from ‘The Submission’ to The Supreme Court of Canada:

‘The harmless Canadian NON shareholders, et al, both; Native & non Native

v.

The SHAREHOLDERS & Corporations of AMERICA, the EU, Canada, et al’.

see; davidehsmith.wordpress.com

or,

Google.

For the FULL ‘Submission’,

see; The Supreme Court of Canada.

&

  1. D) More political Interference of RCMP investigations;

see; ‘Dispersing the Fog’, Paul Palango.

 

 

35) The ‘EMPIRE’* STRIKES BACK against Huge Indirect Taxes to pay (‘Death-Star’-Chamber) Tribunals’ Punitive Penalties? *the ‘harmless’ citizens of the Anti-Global Corporate Economy

The ‘EMPIRE’* STRIKES BACK against Huge Indirect Taxes to pay (‘Death-Star’-Chamber) Tribunals’ Punitive Penalties?                                                                                       *the ‘harmless’ citizens of the Anti-Global Corporate Economy                                   

Japan; TPP & the other Global Corporate treaties/’arrangements’;                                    ‘The Submission’ to The Supreme Court of Canada paves the way for Expanding & Improving the basis of the Yamada led ‘Sword & Shield’ Counter-attack Suit against the Japanese gov’t, et al. TPP & other Global Corporate Treaties/’Arrangements’ signatory gov’ts. in Conflict of Interest.

TPP, et al, Just in Time to protect carcinogenic ‘Round Up’ & other Toxic products & Foods; the Future of ‘Legal’ Poisoning of harmless Customers starts NOW. Taxes Cut as Gov’ts pass Lawsuit Costs to harmless citizens?

(CAN.) – The TPP & the other global corporate treaties/’arrangements’ provides that the signatory governments will, not only, be no longer able to sue corporations for not adhering to the laws of their host countries & thereby, replace the desire of American lead corporations for tort reform with tort abolishment, but the TPP will also place the signatory governments in positions of a conflict of interest in regard to their own harmless citizens who are being forced to find their own, non-governmental means of enforcing existing & future laws that have been passed by way of:

1) the secrecy of unethical lobbyists for the benefits of their wealthy corporation clients & their shareholders,                                                                                                                                     &/or,                                                                                                                                                                    2) the ethical desire to compete with other countries by passing laws that  protect & enhance the well-being of its citizens regarding their health care, education, worker safety, environment, transfer payments, etc.

However, it seems that it is only recently that the harmless citizens of Japan are learning that due to Corporate Canada’s, &/or, the government of Canada’s, anxious desire to impress its TPP corporate associates, &/or, the citizens of Japan, et al, with:

1) its unencumbered access to the natural resources that are continuing to be discovered in Canada,

2) its ability to ‘manage’ Native Canadians in regard to accessing the aforementioned natural resources in Canada                                                                                                                         &                                                                                                                                                                            3) et al,

Corporate Canada, &/or, the Canadian government has misinformed its corporate associates & deprived its corporate associates of due diligence information (eg. the Canadian government, et al, is continuing to deprive Native Canadians, et al, of the information & questions in The W.A.D. Accord),  which will greatly affect the costs of developing the aforementioned natural resources, and thus, as a consequence of Corporate Canada’s, &/or, the Canadian government’s actions it has given the harmless citizens of Japan, et al, the basis for:

1) not only, suing Corporate Canada, &/or, the government of Canada, via the Canadian government,                                                                                                                                                  but for:                                                                                                                                                               2) also expanding & improving upon Mr. Yamada’s existing suit against the Japanese government, &/or, Corporate Japan, et al, as well.

And, thus, Corporate Canada, via their lobbyists to the Canadian government, are most anxious to escape from their liabilities by a rapid ratification of the TPP, et al.

Therefore, the Japanese group, led by Mr. Masahiko Yamada, who are suing their government regarding the Trans-Pacific Partnership on behalf of themselves & the citizens of Japan, might seriously consider suing Corporate Canada, in order to ensure that they, the harmless citizens, do not end up having to ‘contribute’ any of their tax dollars to pay for The Compensation in The W.A.D. Accord, et al, & thereby, prevent Corporate Canada from escaping its liabilities by way of the ratification of the TPP, et al.

Furthermore, by suing Corporate Canada &/or, the government of Canada, by Mr. Yamada’s group, would enable the harmless citizens of Japan as a ‘sword’ & a ‘shield’ to prevent the government of Japan from using any of tax dollars of the harmless citizens of Japan to further punish the harmless citizens, ie. the ‘shield’ & to provide the monies necessary from the punitive damages, on an on-going basis, to continue to fight the future capricious forays & assaults against the harmless citizens’ democracy and counteract the damages to it, etc. caused by Corporate Japan, the government of Japan, et al, ie. the ‘sword’.

Please see the reference material below:

‘The Submission’ to The Supreme Court of Canada: ‘The SHAREHOLDERS & Corporations of JAPAN, America, China, Canada, the EU, the TransPacific nations, et al,                                                                                                                                                                   v.                                                                                                                                                                       the (harmless) Canadian NON shareholders, both; Native & non Native, et al’    (see; davidehsmith.wordpress.com)

which includes:                                                                                                                                       1) The W.A.D. Accord,                                                                                                                           2) ‘The  MERKEL (Chancellor of Germany) Letter; To Sue, or, Be Sued?’                                 &                                                                                                                                                                   3) et al.

‘The Submission also considers:                                                                                                                1) what is a ‘good corporate citizen’                                                                                                            &                                                                                                                                                                          2) which are not good corporate citizens to conform, or, to make the corporations persona non grata.   

1) EXCERPTS #1 from ‘The Submission’; The SUPREME COURT of CANADA; The SHAREHOLDERS, corporates CANADA, AMERICA, EUROPE, CHINA, The TRANS-PACIFIC NATIONS, et al, v. the ‘harmless’ non-shareholders of Canada, both; Native & non Native, et al.

The ‘harmless’ NON-Shareholder’s RESPONSE to the EXCERPTS from ‘The Submission’; The SUPREME COURT of CANADA;
The SHAREHOLDERS, corporates CANADA, AMERICA, EUROPE, CHINA, The TRANS-PACIFIC NATIONS, et al,
v.
the ‘harmless’ NON-Shareholders of Canada, both; Native & non Native, et al.

CETAgreement, TPPartnership, C-CITreaty, et al; More Taxes & Less Services to pay The SHAREHOLDERS (Tribunals).

“WILL The COURT CONSIDER…?”

And, lest one forgets that the revelation of the present perilous International treaties/”arrangements” began with the regard for the rights of Native Canadians as per the Treaties/”arrangements” that corporate Canada & the Government of Canada have “foisted” upon Native Canadians…

Are YOU Depriving your Highest Court of the INFO to Decide Against the Global Corporate Economy?
Has Frau Bundaskanzarin Angela Merkel (Germ.) shared the Info with YOU?
by David E.H. Smith

(CAN.)…Therefore, as a consequence of the aforementioned abuses that have been listed in the enclosed research articles & the dire peril that these abuses puts the NON shareholding Canadians in, both; Native & non Native, et al, as an elaborate, ”inhumane”, ”unethical”, “immoral” & probably, criminal, enterprise, the writer humbly asks; under what circumstances would The Court consider the following?

1) Will The Court consider ensuring that any further attempts by off shore enterprises, such as the aforementioned attempts by the global corporate “arrangements”, including
corporate Canada & its associates within the government of Canada, et al, as a “reciprocity pool” of shared “secret decisions” against the non shareholders of Canada, et al,
will be dealt with punitively.

2) And, in the interim, until The Court can make a determination of any wrongful intent, &/or, abuses of the ”arrangements” as a criminal enterprise,
will the open & public Supreme Court of Canada consider
preventing the further use of the non shareholders‘ tax dollars from being used to make any, &/or, any more secret decisions against themselves, ie. the NON shareholders.

3) Furthermore, can, or, will The Court consider ordering the return of any & all of the tax dollars that have been used by the government, &/or, corporate Canada & their lawyers, et al, that have been used for the development of the aforementioned “arrangements” of a what The Court may determine to be a criminal enterprise (for examples; a) as a means of using/legitimizing off-shore money, et al, b) laundering money from the proceeds of criminal enterprises, &/or, c) going toward the funding of “criminals”, et al, who may be involved in other criminal, or, unethical, or, inhumane, immoral enterprises),
and thus,
the tax dollars have not been used for the purposes that the taxpayers had intended, such as; for goods, services (particularly to police organizations & judiciaries for their investigation of, not only the aforementioned secret/privileged relationship between corporate Canada via its lobbyists
and
the executives of the relevant political parties,
but, the alleged wrong doing by others, as well),
programs, health, education, etc. that are consistent with the NON shareholders‘ understanding of what “good” government entails
and
return the tax dollars with punitive penalties paid to the NON shareholding Canadians, both: Native & non Native, et al.

Similarly, given the reckless endangering situation that the government, et al, has placed the NON shareholders in, can, or, will the Court ensure that the necessary funds will be spent for their, the NON shareholders‘, intended purposes in order to “guarantee” these services, et al,
and
consider ordering corporate Canada, its shareholders & their lawyers, advisers & service beneficiaries of the present “arrangements” will be paid with their own funds, prior to presenting their future “adventures”, &/or, “arrangements” to:
A) The Court, &/or, its representatives
and then,
B) the NON shareholders for their consideration, discussions, improvements, &/or, rejections, et al,
in open forums that have eliminated the fear of recriminations, retributions, etc. by corporate Canada, its shareholders, The Tribunals, et al.

4 A) And, lest one forgets that the revelation of the present perilous International treaties/”arrangements” began with the regard for the rights of Native Canadians as per the Treaties/”arrangements” that corporate Canada & the Government of Canada have “foisted” upon Native Canadians who have been deliberately deprived of the due diligence information, such as the information in The W.A.D. Accord, et al,

I am compelled to ask The Court:
will the Court consider whether, or, not The Court’s recent “Tsilhqot’in Decision”, makes
it easier for corporate Canada, its global economic associates, their shareholders, et al, to sue the Tsilhqot’in First Nation & other Native communities in Canada
and thereby, to seek financial relief from the harmless NON shareholding, non Native Canadians via the Government of Canada? And, will The Court consider preventing
any unrelated hardship to the NON shareholders as a consequence of the creation of the
aforementioned Tribunals & corporate Canada & its associates intent to obtain the unencumbered access to the natural resources that are continuing to be found in Canada & irrespective of Native title to these lands & its resources?

  1. B) And, similarly, does the plan espoused by the American born Tom Eugene Flanagan which would enable First Nations communities to become municipalities, also make it easier for corporate Canada, its associates, et al, to sue Native communities, or, seek remedies from the Government of Canada (ie. from the NON shareholders) for any encumbrances that the new, Native municipalities, et al, might impose upon the development, &/or, access to the aforementioned natural resources, etc.?

(And, regarding the settlement of Native land claims that are presently before Canadian courts, & will continue to be before the courts for some time, the following question can help The Court a great deal in these deliberations, and that is; how were Europeans convinced to settle in North America in the first place & in particular, the land that became known as Canada?)

5) Therefore, can I only hope that given the enclosed information about the abuse, the potential for abuse & the intent of the aforementioned Tribunals which is:
A) to abuse & to limit The Court’s ability to hear…                                                                    ***
Please consider sharing the enclosed information & questions with 10 members of your family, friends, associates in order that they can use the due diligence info to make more informed decision about their families‘ financial planning, & then they can share it with 10 others…
***
To SHARE Information & Questions re; The Relationship between Human
(Nature) Rights & Economics in 1) the TPP, C-CI Treaty, the CET Agreement, et al, and 2) Native Canadian Treaties via The WAD Accord
,
see; davidehsmith.wordpress.com                                                                                            ***
For Excerpts of  ‘The Submission‘ to The Supreme Court of Canada,
see; davidehsmith.wordpress.com
***                                                                                                                                                        For the FULL Submission
see; The Supreme Court of Canada.                                                                            ***Also see, 36) ‘The BASIS for TREATIES/’ARRANGEMENTS’ LITIGATION as an INVESTMENT’; davidehsmith.wordpress.com                                                               ***And; 4) ‘INSIDER TRADING’ (The Need for Secrecy),  davidehsmith.wordpress.com                                                                               

 

2) ‘The MERKEL (Chancellor of Germany) Letter; To Sue, or, Be Sued?’ (Part of ‘The Submission’ to The Supreme Court of Canada)

‘The MERKEL (Chancellor of Germany) Letter; To Sue, or, Be Sued?’ (Part of ‘The Submission’ to The Supreme Court of Canada)

Re; The European Union – Canada Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA)
and The W.A.D. Accord & Its Compensation.

What the TREATY of VERSAILLES was to the 20th century PALES in COMPARISON to the TPP, CETA, C-CIT, NAFTA, et al, in the 21st.

CHANCELLOR Merkel;
In the matter of the C.E.T.A. and The W.A.D. Accord (THE ACCORD),
as corporate Germany, and/or, the Government of Germany may be in the process of being:
1) misled,
2) misinformed,
and/or,
3) deliberately deprived of relevant due diligence information, et al, by corporate Canada,

and/or, the Government of Canada
regarding:
1) the risks,
2) the liabilities,
3) the responsibilities
and
4) et al,

that corporate Canada, and/or, the Government of Canada may be attempting to:
1) avoid paying,
or,
2) dilute the amount of,
and/or,
3) etc.,
of its/their contribution(s) to The Compensation that is embodied in THE ACCORD (aka; “The Australian Question”) by way of the design, the development and the
ratification of THE AGREEMENT and its Tribunals(s),

and,

as the attempts at the aforementioned
“avoiding”, and/or, the “diluting” may be construed as acts
of guilt of, but, not limited to:
1) corporate Canada,
2) the Government of Canada,
3) the other signatories to THE AGREEMENT,
4) THE ASSOCIATES
and
5) et al,

raises the due diligence questions regarding the charges against:
1) corporate Canada,
and/or,
2)the Government of Canada,

for deliberately failing to provide (the) due diligence information to its (THE) ASSOCIATES

page 1 of 3

and

2) raises the due diligence questions regarding the MUTUAL charges against all of THE ASSOCIATES to THE AGREEMENT, for deliberately failing to provide (the) due diligence information regarding THE ACCORD and The Compensation to THE SHAREHOLDERS, and/or, THE POTENTIAL SHAREHOLDERS,
and thereby,

THE SIGNATORIES to THE AGREEMENT and THE ASSOCIATES are in the process of creating and developing an ENTERPRISE for purposes, but, not limited to:
A) defrauding,
B) manipulating the value of Initial Public Offerings (IPOs), stocks, and/or, other financial
instruments that may be a product of THE ENTERPRISE and its subsequent ventures,
C) insider trading
D) racketeering
and
E) et al,
and,
as a consequence of the creation and the development of the new, secret and superseding jurisdiction by THE ASSOCIATES, and, thus, the creation of the “de facto”
jurisdiction, and the creation of THE TRIBUNAL(s) in order to:
1) PROTECT:
A) THE ASSOCIATES,
B) the Government Signatories to THE AGREEMENT,
C) the proceeds of the alleged criminal ENTERPRISE
and
D) et al,

by preventing:
A) investigations,
B) evidence and testimony,
C) findings, decisions,
determinations, and/or, conclusions
and
D) et al,

from being:
A) conducted,
and/or,
B) disclosed, and/or, made public,
and thereby, render any, and all, judgements, and findings by the courts of lesser, and/or,
“non” jurisdictions against:
A) THE ASSOCIATES, and/or, their representatives,
B) THE ENTERPRISE,
C) the subsequent, and/or, associated ventures, et al,
and
D) the Government Signatories to THE AGREEMENT,

to be; moot, null, void, and/or, without merit,
and thus,
render any actions against the aforementioned ASSOCIATES, et al, unenforceable
and,
provide the basis for “net” counter-suits against THE NON SHAREHOLDERS by way of the Governments of THE NON SHAREHOLDERS, that is to say the Government of Canada, et al,

page 2 of 3 and

2) SECRETLY ADJUDICATE, determine and enforce “net” decisions against THE NON SHAREHOLDERS
and the lesser provincial/state and municipal governments via the agreeable SIGNATORY Governments (that is to say; The
Government of Canada, et al) by way of:
A) punitive; fines, penalties,
and/or, damages,
B) trade sanctions
and
C) et al,
for depriving THE ASSOCIATES of the profits that could be derived as a consequence of the unimpeded, and/or, unencumbered development of the ventures of THE ASSOCIATES and THE ENTERPRISE,
and, as a consequence of the
aforementioned actions, and others,
I am compelled to inform you of this notification.

Other charges that have been raised against:
1) THE ASSOCIATES, and/or, their representatives,
2) THE ENTERPRISE,
3) the subsequent, and/or, associated ventures, et al,
4) the Government Signatories to THE AGREEMENT
and
5) et al,
are:
1) deliberate ignorance,
2) malicious intent,
3) depraved indifference,
4) reckless endangerment
and
5) et al.

In conclusion, as the Government of Germany has publicly acknowledged its concern about the “Investor-State Dispute Settlement” (I.S.D.S.) in THE AGREEMENT, I would ask you, Frau Bundaskanzarin Merkel, if you might be amenable to discussing the merits of enjoining in a suit against:
1) corporate Canada,
2) the Government of Canada
and
3) et al?

Sincerely,

David E.H. Smith
– Researcher
– “Qui tam…”
page 3 of 3

******
Please consider sharing the enclosed information & questions with 10 members of your family, friends, associates in order that they can use the due diligence info to make more informed decision about their families‘ financial planning, & then they can share it with 10 others…
******
For more Information & Questions re; The Relationship between Human (Nature) Rights & Economics by way of the TPP, C-CI Treaty, the CET Agreement, et al, and The WAD Accord
& List of RECENT ARTICLES, LETTERS & NOTIFICATIONS by DEHS.
see; davidehsmith.wordpress.com

34) TPP; Japan; ‘The Submission’ to The Supreme Court of Canada paves the way for Expanding & Improving the basis of the Yamada led ‘Sword & Shield’ Counter attack Suit against the Japanese gov’t, et al. TPP & other Global Corporate Treaties/’Arrangements’ signatory gov’ts. in Conflict of Interest.

TPP; Japan; ‘The Submission’ to The Supreme Court of Canada paves the way for Expanding & Improving the basis of the Yamada led ‘Sword & Shield’ Counter attack Suit against the Japanese gov’t, et al. TPP & other Global Corporate Treaties/’Arrangements’ signatory gov’ts. in Conflict of Interest.

TPP, et al, Just in Time to protect carcinogenic ‘Round Up’ & other Toxic products & Foods; the Future of ‘Legal’ Poisoning of harmless Customers starts NOW. Taxes Cut as Gov’ts pass Lawsuit Costs to harmless citizens?

(CAN.) – The TPP & the other global corporate treaties/’arrangements’ provides that the signatory governments will, not only, be no longer able to sue corporations for not adhering to the laws of their host countries & thereby, replace the desire of American lead corporations for tort reform with tort abolishment, but the TPP will also place the signatory governments in positions of a conflict of interest in regard to their own harmless citizens who are being forced to find their own, non-governmental means of enforcing existing & future laws that have been passed by way of:                                         1) the secrecy of unethical lobbyists for the benefits of their wealthy corporation clients & their shareholders,                                                                                                                 &/or,                                                                                                                                                               2) the ethical desire to compete with other countries by passing laws that  protect & enhance the well-being of its citizens regarding their health care, education, worker safety, environment, transfer payments, etc.

However, it seems that it is only recently that the harmless citizens of Japan are learning that due to Corporate Canada’s, &/or, the government of Canada’s, anxious desire to impress its TPP corporate associates, &/or, the citizens of Japan, et al, with:     1) its unencumbered access to the natural resources that are continuing to be discovered in Canada,                                                                                                                               2) its ability to ‘manage’ Native Canadians in regard to accessing the aforementioned natural resources in Canada                                                                                                                   &                                                                                                                                                                     3) et al,                                                                                                                                                 Corporate Canada, &/or, the Canadian government has misinformed its corporate associates & deprived its corporate associates of due diligence information (eg. the Canadian government, et al, is continuing to deprive Native Canadians, et al, of the information & questions in The W.A.D. Accord),                                                                           which will greatly affect the costs of developing the aforementioned natural resources, and thus, as a consequence of Corporate Canada’s, &/or, the Canadian government’s actions it has given the harmless citizens of Japan, et al, the basis for:     1) not only, suing Corporate Canada, &/or, the government of Canada, via the Canadian government,                                                                                                                             but, for :                                                                                                                                                       2) also expanding & improving upon Mr. Yamada’s existing suit against the Japanese government, &/or, Corporate Japan, et al, as well.

And, thus, Corporate Canada, via their lobbyists to the Canadian government, are most anxious to escape from their liabilities by a rapid ratification of the TPP, et al.

Therefore, the Japanese group, led by Mr. Masahiko Yamada, who are suing their government regarding the Trans-Pacific Partnership on behalf of themselves & the citizens of Japan, might seriously consider suing Corporate Canada, in order to ensure that they, the harmless citizens, do not end up having to ‘contribute’ any of their tax dollars to pay for The Compensation in The W.A.D. Accord, et al, & thereby, prevent Corporate Canada from escaping its liabilities by way of the ratification of the TPP, et al.

Furthermore, by suing Corporate Canada &/or, the government of Canada, by Mr. Yamada’s group, would enable the harmless citizens of Japan as a ‘sword’ & a ‘shield’ to prevent the government of Japan from using any of tax dollars of the harmless citizens of Japan to further punish the harmless citizens, ie. the ‘shield’ & to provide the monies necessary from the punitive damages, on an on-going basis, to continue to fight the future capricious forays & assaults against the harmless citizens’ democracy   and counteract the damages to it, etc. caused by Corporate Japan, the government of Japan, et al, ie. the ‘sword’.

Please see the reference material below:                                                                                         ‘The Submission’ to The Supreme Court of Canada: ‘The SHAREHOLDERS &                Corporations of JAPAN, America, China, Canada, the EU, the TransPacific nations, et al,                                                                                                                                                                vs.                                                                                                                                                               the (harmless) Canadian NON shareholders, both; Native & non Native, et al’    (see; davidehsmith.wordpress.com)

which includes:                                                                                                                                           1) The W.A.D. Accord,                                                                                                                       2) ‘The MERKEL (Chancellor of Germany) Letter; To Sue, or, Be Sued?’                           &                                                                                                                                                             3) et al.

‘The Submission’ also considers:                                                                                                         1) what is a ‘good corporate citizen’                                                                                                     &                                                                                                                                                                     2) how to make those corporations which are not good corporate citizens to conform, or, to make the corporations persona non grata.   

The letter to Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, ‘Prime Minister Abe; You’ve been Served with; The NOTIFICATION of Pre-existing CHALLENGE to The TPP’, was sent separately.

Please also see; ‘The Basis for Litigation & Litigation Funders; Suing the Global Corporate Economy’.                                                                                                                   ***                                                                                                                                               Mr.Yamada & the citizens of Japan, I look forward to reading about your thoughts, your questions, your feelings, your improvements, etc., regarding the enclosed.

If you should have any questions, or, problems with the enclosed questions & information, &/or, any other related material, I can be contacted via davidehsmith.wordpress.com

David E.H. Smith                                                                                                                                       – Researcher                                                                                                                                               – ‘Qui tam…’