36) BASIS for INVESTMENT LITIGATION; SUING the GLOBAL ECONOMY.

 

BASIS for INVESTMENT LITIGATION; SUING the GLOBAL ECONOMY.

 

Re; ‘The Submission’ to The SUPREME COURT of CANADA:

‘The SHAREHOLDERS & Corporations of AMERICA, China, Canada, the EU, the

Trans-Pacific nations, et al
v.
the (harmless) Canadian NON shareholders, both; Native & non Native, et al’

 

1) The most vulnerable Aboriginal Canadian community members (95% – 99% of Aboriginal Canadians) are being deprived of the due diligence information regarding the criteria for ascertaining the health & robustness of an Native Canadian community’s economy.

 

2) A psychologist agreed that there is a relationship between the DEPRIVATION of the aforementioned information

and

the unconscionably high rates of SUICIDES, etc. that are found in many of the Aboriginal communities across Canada.

 

3) As a consequence of being deprived of the aforementioned information the most vulnerable Aboriginal Canadian community members are entitled to be COMPENSATED as per The W.A.D. Accord.

 

4) The most vulnerable NON Aboriginal Canadian community members (95% – 99% of NON Aboriginal Canadians) are being deprived of the information regarding the most vulnerable Aboriginal community members’ deprivation the aforementioned criteria

and

are forced to pay billions for the NON criteria based Native enterprises that are unhealthy & which prevent the most vulnerable Native community members from obtaining the benefits of their robust economies.

 

5) As a means of avoiding, &/or, diluting any, &/or, all of corporate Canada’s contribution to the aforementioned Compensation, corporate Canada is, & will continue, to pay considerations (lobbying) to the government of Canada via the executives of the political parties operating in Canada, et al, to promote the development of the superseding secret Tribunals of the present treaty ‘arrangements’ which have been designed to punitively punish the harmless Canadians NON shareholders, both; Native & NON Native, for allegedly encumbering corporate Canada, its associates and their shareholders (ie. The Global Corporate Economy) from the potential profits that might be derived from the development of the natural resources that are continuing to be found in Canada.

 

6) As corporate Canada & its shareholders, the government of Canada, the executives of the political parties that are operating in Canada, et al, are;

  1. A) depriving the harmless NON shareholders of Canada, the USA, the EU, the Trans Pacific nations, et al, of the risks associates with the treaty ‘arrangements’, such as; being forced to pay any & all of the punitive damages of the trade Tribunals,

&/or,

  1. B) depriving the harmless SHAREHOLDERS & corporate leaders of the USA, the EU, the Trans Pacific nations, et al, of the risks associates with the treaty ‘arrangements’, such as; being forced to pay any & all of the punitive damages of the trade Tribunals,

&/or,

  1. C) have not conducted their due diligence investigations of the risks involved with development of the superseding tribunals in order that corporate Canada, et al, can share their information with the NON shareholders, et al,

&/or,

  1. D) are preventing the RCMP, et al, from conducting investigations of the aforementioned risks by way of more political interference,

&

  1. E) et al,

 

corporate Canada & its shareholders, et al, are liable.

 

To Access the Relevant Reference Material:

  1. A) The W.A.D. Accord & its Compensation (aka; The Australian Question),

see; davidehsmith.wordpress.com

or,

Google.

  1. B) ‘The MERKEL (Chancellor of Germany) Letter; To Sue, or, Be Sued?’,

see; davidehsmith.wordpress.com

or,

Google.

  1. C) Excerpts from ‘The Submission’ to The Supreme Court of Canada:

‘The harmless Canadian NON shareholders, et al, both; Native & non Native

v.

The SHAREHOLDERS & Corporations of AMERICA, the EU, Canada, et al’.

see; davidehsmith.wordpress.com

or,

Google.

For the FULL ‘Submission’,

see; The Supreme Court of Canada.

&

  1. D) More political Interference of RCMP investigations;

see; ‘Dispersing the Fog’, Paul Palango.

 

 

35) The ‘EMPIRE’* STRIKES BACK against Huge Indirect Taxes to pay (‘Death-Star’-Chamber) Tribunals’ Punitive Penalties? *the ‘harmless’ citizens of the Anti-Global Corporate Economy

The ‘EMPIRE’* STRIKES BACK against Huge Indirect Taxes to pay (‘Death-Star’-Chamber) Tribunals’ Punitive Penalties?                                                                                       *the ‘harmless’ citizens of the Anti-Global Corporate Economy                                   

Japan; TPP & the other Global Corporate treaties/’arrangements’;                                    ‘The Submission’ to The Supreme Court of Canada paves the way for Expanding & Improving the basis of the Yamada led ‘Sword & Shield’ Counter-attack Suit against the Japanese gov’t, et al. TPP & other Global Corporate Treaties/’Arrangements’ signatory gov’ts. in Conflict of Interest.

TPP, et al, Just in Time to protect carcinogenic ‘Round Up’ & other Toxic products & Foods; the Future of ‘Legal’ Poisoning of harmless Customers starts NOW. Taxes Cut as Gov’ts pass Lawsuit Costs to harmless citizens?

(CAN.) – The TPP & the other global corporate treaties/’arrangements’ provides that the signatory governments will, not only, be no longer able to sue corporations for not adhering to the laws of their host countries & thereby, replace the desire of American lead corporations for tort reform with tort abolishment, but the TPP will also place the signatory governments in positions of a conflict of interest in regard to their own harmless citizens who are being forced to find their own, non-governmental means of enforcing existing & future laws that have been passed by way of:

1) the secrecy of unethical lobbyists for the benefits of their wealthy corporation clients & their shareholders,                                                                                                                                     &/or,                                                                                                                                                                    2) the ethical desire to compete with other countries by passing laws that  protect & enhance the well-being of its citizens regarding their health care, education, worker safety, environment, transfer payments, etc.

However, it seems that it is only recently that the harmless citizens of Japan are learning that due to Corporate Canada’s, &/or, the government of Canada’s, anxious desire to impress its TPP corporate associates, &/or, the citizens of Japan, et al, with:

1) its unencumbered access to the natural resources that are continuing to be discovered in Canada,

2) its ability to ‘manage’ Native Canadians in regard to accessing the aforementioned natural resources in Canada                                                                                                                         &                                                                                                                                                                            3) et al,

Corporate Canada, &/or, the Canadian government has misinformed its corporate associates & deprived its corporate associates of due diligence information (eg. the Canadian government, et al, is continuing to deprive Native Canadians, et al, of the information & questions in The W.A.D. Accord),  which will greatly affect the costs of developing the aforementioned natural resources, and thus, as a consequence of Corporate Canada’s, &/or, the Canadian government’s actions it has given the harmless citizens of Japan, et al, the basis for:

1) not only, suing Corporate Canada, &/or, the government of Canada, via the Canadian government,                                                                                                                                                  but for:                                                                                                                                                               2) also expanding & improving upon Mr. Yamada’s existing suit against the Japanese government, &/or, Corporate Japan, et al, as well.

And, thus, Corporate Canada, via their lobbyists to the Canadian government, are most anxious to escape from their liabilities by a rapid ratification of the TPP, et al.

Therefore, the Japanese group, led by Mr. Masahiko Yamada, who are suing their government regarding the Trans-Pacific Partnership on behalf of themselves & the citizens of Japan, might seriously consider suing Corporate Canada, in order to ensure that they, the harmless citizens, do not end up having to ‘contribute’ any of their tax dollars to pay for The Compensation in The W.A.D. Accord, et al, & thereby, prevent Corporate Canada from escaping its liabilities by way of the ratification of the TPP, et al.

Furthermore, by suing Corporate Canada &/or, the government of Canada, by Mr. Yamada’s group, would enable the harmless citizens of Japan as a ‘sword’ & a ‘shield’ to prevent the government of Japan from using any of tax dollars of the harmless citizens of Japan to further punish the harmless citizens, ie. the ‘shield’ & to provide the monies necessary from the punitive damages, on an on-going basis, to continue to fight the future capricious forays & assaults against the harmless citizens’ democracy and counteract the damages to it, etc. caused by Corporate Japan, the government of Japan, et al, ie. the ‘sword’.

Please see the reference material below:

‘The Submission’ to The Supreme Court of Canada: ‘The SHAREHOLDERS & Corporations of JAPAN, America, China, Canada, the EU, the TransPacific nations, et al,                                                                                                                                                                   v.                                                                                                                                                                       the (harmless) Canadian NON shareholders, both; Native & non Native, et al’    (see; davidehsmith.wordpress.com)

which includes:                                                                                                                                       1) The W.A.D. Accord,                                                                                                                           2) ‘The  MERKEL (Chancellor of Germany) Letter; To Sue, or, Be Sued?’                                 &                                                                                                                                                                   3) et al.

‘The Submission also considers:                                                                                                                1) what is a ‘good corporate citizen’                                                                                                            &                                                                                                                                                                          2) which are not good corporate citizens to conform, or, to make the corporations persona non grata.   

1) The ‘harmless’ NON-Shareholder’s RESPONSE to the EXCERPTS from ‘The Submission’; The SUPREME COURT of CANADA; The SHAREHOLDERS, corporates CANADA, AMERICA, EUROPE, CHINA, The TRANS-PACIFIC NATIONS, et al, v. the ‘harmless’ non-shareholders of Canada, both; Native & non Native, et al.

The ‘harmless’ NON-Shareholder’s RESPONSE to the EXCERPTS from ‘The Submission’; The SUPREME COURT of CANADA;
The SHAREHOLDERS, corporates CANADA, AMERICA, EUROPE, CHINA, The TRANS-PACIFIC NATIONS, et al,
v.
the ‘harmless’ NON-Shareholders of Canada, both; Native & non Native, et al.

CETAgreement, TPPartnership, C-CITreaty, et al; More Taxes & Less Services to pay The SHAREHOLDERS (Tribunals).

“WILL The COURT CONSIDER…?”

And, lest one forgets that the revelation of the present perilous International treaties/”arrangements” began with the regard for the rights of Native Canadians as per the Treaties/”arrangements” that corporate Canada & the Government of Canada have “foisted” upon Native Canadians…

Are YOU Depriving your Highest Court of the INFO to Decide Against the Global Corporate Economy?
Has Frau Bundaskanzarin Angela Merkel (Germ.) shared the Info with YOU?

by David E.H. Smith

(CAN.)…Therefore, as a consequence of the aforementioned abuses that have been listed in the enclosed research articles & the dire peril that these abuses puts the NON shareholding Canadians in, both; Native & non Native, et al, as an elaborate, ”inhumane”, ”unethical”, “immoral” & probably, criminal, enterprise, the writer humbly asks; under what circumstances would The Court consider the following?

1) Will The Court consider ensuring that any further attempts by off shore enterprises, such as the aforementioned attempts by the global corporate “arrangements”, including
corporate Canada & its associates within the government of Canada, et al, as a “reciprocity pool” of shared “secret decisions” against the non shareholders of Canada, et al,
will be dealt with punitively.

2) And, in the interim, until The Court can make a determination of any wrongful intent, &/or, abuses of the ”arrangements” as a criminal enterprise,
will the open & public Supreme Court of Canada consider
preventing the further use of the non shareholders‘ tax dollars from being used to make any, &/or, any more secret decisions against themselves, ie. the NON shareholders.

3) Furthermore, can, or, will The Court consider ordering the return of any & all of the tax dollars that have been used by the government, &/or, corporate Canada & their lawyers, et al, that have been used for the development of the aforementioned “arrangements” of a what The Court may determine to be a criminal enterprise (for examples; a) as a means of using/legitimizing off-shore money, et al, b) laundering money from the proceeds of criminal enterprises, &/or, c) going toward the funding of “criminals”, et al, who may be involved in other criminal, or, unethical, or, inhumane, immoral enterprises),
and thus,
the tax dollars have not been used for the purposes that the taxpayers had intended, such as; for goods, services (particularly to police organizations & judiciaries for their investigation of, not only the aforementioned secret/privileged relationship between corporate Canada via its lobbyists
and
the executives of the relevant political parties,
but, the alleged wrong doing by others, as well),
programs, health, education, etc. that are consistent with the NON shareholders‘ understanding of what “good” government entails
and
return the tax dollars with punitive penalties paid to the NON shareholding Canadians, both: Native & non Native, et al.

Similarly, given the reckless endangering situation that the government, et al, has placed the NON shareholders in, can, or, will the Court ensure that the necessary funds will be spent for their, the NON shareholders‘, intended purposes in order to “guarantee” these services, et al,
and
consider ordering corporate Canada, its shareholders & their lawyers, advisers & service beneficiaries of the present “arrangements” will be paid with their own funds, prior to presenting their future “adventures”, &/or, “arrangements” to:
A) The Court, &/or, its representatives
and then,
B) the NON shareholders for their consideration, discussions, improvements, &/or, rejections, et al,
in open forums that have eliminated the fear of recriminations, retributions, etc. by corporate Canada, its shareholders, The Tribunals, et al.

4 A) And, lest one forgets that the revelation of the present perilous International treaties/”arrangements” began with the regard for the rights of Native Canadians as per the Treaties/”arrangements” that corporate Canada & the Government of Canada have “foisted” upon Native Canadians who have been deliberately deprived of the due diligence information, such as the information in The W.A.D. Accord, et al,

I am compelled to ask The Court:
will the Court consider whether, or, not The Court’s recent “Tsilhqot’in Decision”, makes
it easier for corporate Canada, its global economic associates, their shareholders, et al, to sue the Tsilhqot’in First Nation & other Native communities in Canada
and thereby, to seek financial relief from the harmless NON shareholding, non Native Canadians via the Government of Canada? And, will The Court consider preventing
any unrelated hardship to the NON shareholders as a consequence of the creation of the
aforementioned Tribunals & corporate Canada & its associates intent to obtain the unencumbered access to the natural resources that are continuing to be found in Canada & irrespective of Native title to these lands & its resources?

  1. B) And, similarly, does the plan espoused by the American born Tom Eugene Flanagan which would enable First Nations communities to become municipalities, also make it easier for corporate Canada, its associates, et al, to sue Native communities, or, seek remedies from the Government of Canada (ie. from the NON shareholders) for any encumbrances that the new, Native municipalities, et al, might impose upon the development, &/or, access to the aforementioned natural resources, etc.?

(And, regarding the settlement of Native land claims that are presently before Canadian courts, & will continue to be before the courts for some time, the following question can help The Court a great deal in these deliberations, and that is; how were Europeans convinced to settle in North America in the first place & in particular, the land that became known as Canada?)

5) Therefore, can I only hope that given the enclosed information about the abuse, the potential for abuse & the intent of the aforementioned Tribunals which is:
A) to abuse & to limit The Court’s ability to hear…

***
Please consider sharing the enclosed information & questions with 10 members of your family, friends, associates in order that they can use the due diligence info to make more informed decision about their families‘ financial planning, & then they can share it with 10 others…
***
To SHARE Information & Questions re; The Relationship between Human
(Nature) Rights & Economics in 1) the TPP, C-CI Treaty, the CET Agreement, et al, and 2) Native Canadian Treaties via The WAD Accord
,
see; davidehsmith.wordpress.com

***
For Excerpts of  ‘The Submission‘ to The Supreme Court of Canada,
see; davidehsmith.wordpress.com
***

For the FULL Submission
see; The Supreme Court of Canada.

2) ‘The MERKEL (Chancellor of Germany) Letter; To Sue, or, Be Sued?’ (Part of ‘The Submission’ to The Supreme Court of Canada)

‘The MERKEL (Chancellor of Germany) Letter; To Sue, or, Be Sued?’ (Part of ‘The Submission’ to The Supreme Court of Canada)

Re; The European Union – Canada Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA)
and The W.A.D. Accord & Its Compensation.

What the TREATY of VERSAILLES was to the 20th century PALES in COMPARISON to the TPP, CETA, C-CIT, NAFTA, et al, in the 21st.

CHANCELLOR Merkel;
In the matter of the C.E.T.A. and The W.A.D. Accord (THE ACCORD),
as corporate Germany, and/or, the Government of Germany may be in the process of being:
1) misled,
2) misinformed,
and/or,
3) deliberately deprived of relevant due diligence information, et al, by corporate Canada,

and/or, the Government of Canada
regarding:
1) the risks,
2) the liabilities,
3) the responsibilities
and
4) et al,

that corporate Canada, and/or, the Government of Canada may be attempting to:
1) avoid paying,
or,
2) dilute the amount of,
and/or,
3) etc.,
of its/their contribution(s) to The Compensation that is embodied in THE ACCORD (aka; “The Australian Question”) by way of the design, the development and the
ratification of THE AGREEMENT and its Tribunals(s),

and,

as the attempts at the aforementioned
“avoiding”, and/or, the “diluting” may be construed as acts
of guilt of, but, not limited to:
1) corporate Canada,
2) the Government of Canada,
3) the other signatories to THE AGREEMENT,
4) THE ASSOCIATES
and
5) et al,

raises the due diligence questions regarding the charges against:
1) corporate Canada,
and/or,
2)the Government of Canada,

for deliberately failing to provide (the) due diligence information to its (THE) ASSOCIATES

page 1 of 3

and

2) raises the due diligence questions regarding the MUTUAL charges against all of THE ASSOCIATES to THE AGREEMENT, for deliberately failing to provide (the) due diligence information regarding THE ACCORD and The Compensation to THE SHAREHOLDERS, and/or, THE POTENTIAL SHAREHOLDERS,
and thereby,

THE SIGNATORIES to THE AGREEMENT and THE ASSOCIATES are in the process of creating and developing an ENTERPRISE for purposes, but, not limited to:
A) defrauding,
B) manipulating the value of Initial Public Offerings (IPOs), stocks, and/or, other financial
instruments that may be a product of THE ENTERPRISE and its subsequent ventures,
C) insider trading
D) racketeering
and
E) et al,
and,
as a consequence of the creation and the development of the new, secret and superseding jurisdiction by THE ASSOCIATES, and, thus, the creation of the “de facto”
jurisdiction, and the creation of THE TRIBUNAL(s) in order to:
1) PROTECT:
A) THE ASSOCIATES,
B) the Government Signatories to THE AGREEMENT,
C) the proceeds of the alleged criminal ENTERPRISE
and
D) et al,

by preventing:
A) investigations,
B) evidence and testimony,
C) findings, decisions,
determinations, and/or, conclusions
and
D) et al,

from being:
A) conducted,
and/or,
B) disclosed, and/or, made public,
and thereby, render any, and all, judgements, and findings by the courts of lesser, and/or,
“non” jurisdictions against:
A) THE ASSOCIATES, and/or, their representatives,
B) THE ENTERPRISE,
C) the subsequent, and/or, associated ventures, et al,
and
D) the Government Signatories to THE AGREEMENT,

to be; moot, null, void, and/or, without merit,
and thus,
render any actions against the aforementioned ASSOCIATES, et al, unenforceable
and,
provide the basis for “net” counter-suits against THE NON SHAREHOLDERS by way of the Governments of THE NON SHAREHOLDERS, that is to say the Government of Canada, et al,

page 2 of 3 and

2) SECRETLY ADJUDICATE, determine and enforce “net” decisions against THE NON SHAREHOLDERS
and the lesser provincial/state and municipal governments via the agreeable SIGNATORY Governments (that is to say; The
Government of Canada, et al) by way of:
A) punitive; fines, penalties,
and/or, damages,
B) trade sanctions
and
C) et al,
for depriving THE ASSOCIATES of the profits that could be derived as a consequence of the unimpeded, and/or, unencumbered development of the ventures of THE ASSOCIATES and THE ENTERPRISE,
and, as a consequence of the
aforementioned actions, and others,
I am compelled to inform you of this notification.

Other charges that have been raised against:
1) THE ASSOCIATES, and/or, their representatives,
2) THE ENTERPRISE,
3) the subsequent, and/or, associated ventures, et al,
4) the Government Signatories to THE AGREEMENT
and
5) et al,
are:
1) deliberate ignorance,
2) malicious intent,
3) depraved indifference,
4) reckless endangerment
and
5) et al.

In conclusion, as the Government of Germany has publicly acknowledged its concern about the “Investor-State Dispute Settlement” (I.S.D.S.) in THE AGREEMENT, I would ask you, Frau Bundaskanzarin Merkel, if you might be amenable to discussing the merits of enjoining in a suit against:
1) corporate Canada,
2) the Government of Canada
and
3) et al?

Sincerely,

David E.H. Smith
– Researcher
– “Qui tam…”
page 3 of 3

******
Please consider sharing the enclosed information & questions with 10 members of your family, friends, associates in order that they can use the due diligence info to make more informed decision about their families‘ financial planning, & then they can share it with 10 others…
******
For more Information & Questions re; The Relationship between Human (Nature) Rights & Economics by way of the TPP, C-CI Treaty, the CET Agreement, et al, and The WAD Accord
& List of RECENT ARTICLES, LETTERS & NOTIFICATIONS by DEHS.
see; davidehsmith.wordpress.com

34) TPP; Japan; ‘The Submission’ to The Supreme Court of Canada paves the way for Expanding & Improving the basis of the Yamada led ‘Sword & Shield’ Counter attack Suit against the Japanese gov’t, et al. TPP & other Global Corporate Treaties/’Arrangements’ signatory gov’ts. in Conflict of Interest.

TPP; Japan; ‘The Submission’ to The Supreme Court of Canada paves the way for Expanding & Improving the basis of the Yamada led ‘Sword & Shield’ Counter attack Suit against the Japanese gov’t, et al. TPP & other Global Corporate Treaties/’Arrangements’ signatory gov’ts. in Conflict of Interest.

TPP, et al, Just in Time to protect carcinogenic ‘Round Up’ & other Toxic products & Foods; the Future of ‘Legal’ Poisoning of harmless Customers starts NOW. Taxes Cut as Gov’ts pass Lawsuit Costs to harmless citizens?

(CAN.) – The TPP & the other global corporate treaties/’arrangements’ provides that the signatory governments will, not only, be no longer able to sue corporations for not adhering to the laws of their host countries & thereby, replace the desire of American lead corporations for tort reform with tort abolishment, but the TPP will also place the signatory governments in positions of a conflict of interest in regard to their own harmless citizens who are being forced to find their own, non-governmental means of enforcing existing & future laws that have been passed by way of:                                         1) the secrecy of unethical lobbyists for the benefits of their wealthy corporation clients & their shareholders,                                                                                                                 &/or,                                                                                                                                                               2) the ethical desire to compete with other countries by passing laws that  protect & enhance the well-being of its citizens regarding their health care, education, worker safety, environment, transfer payments, etc.

However, it seems that it is only recently that the harmless citizens of Japan are learning that due to Corporate Canada’s, &/or, the government of Canada’s, anxious desire to impress its TPP corporate associates, &/or, the citizens of Japan, et al, with:     1) its unencumbered access to the natural resources that are continuing to be discovered in Canada,                                                                                                                               2) its ability to ‘manage’ Native Canadians in regard to accessing the aforementioned natural resources in Canada                                                                                                                   &                                                                                                                                                                     3) et al,                                                                                                                                                 Corporate Canada, &/or, the Canadian government has misinformed its corporate associates & deprived its corporate associates of due diligence information (eg. the Canadian government, et al, is continuing to deprive Native Canadians, et al, of the information & questions in The W.A.D. Accord),                                                                           which will greatly affect the costs of developing the aforementioned natural resources, and thus, as a consequence of Corporate Canada’s, &/or, the Canadian government’s actions it has given the harmless citizens of Japan, et al, the basis for:     1) not only, suing Corporate Canada, &/or, the government of Canada, via the Canadian government,                                                                                                                             but, for :                                                                                                                                                       2) also expanding & improving upon Mr. Yamada’s existing suit against the Japanese government, &/or, Corporate Japan, et al, as well.

And, thus, Corporate Canada, via their lobbyists to the Canadian government, are most anxious to escape from their liabilities by a rapid ratification of the TPP, et al.

Therefore, the Japanese group, led by Mr. Masahiko Yamada, who are suing their government regarding the Trans-Pacific Partnership on behalf of themselves & the citizens of Japan, might seriously consider suing Corporate Canada, in order to ensure that they, the harmless citizens, do not end up having to ‘contribute’ any of their tax dollars to pay for The Compensation in The W.A.D. Accord, et al, & thereby, prevent Corporate Canada from escaping its liabilities by way of the ratification of the TPP, et al.

Furthermore, by suing Corporate Canada &/or, the government of Canada, by Mr. Yamada’s group, would enable the harmless citizens of Japan as a ‘sword’ & a ‘shield’ to prevent the government of Japan from using any of tax dollars of the harmless citizens of Japan to further punish the harmless citizens, ie. the ‘shield’ & to provide the monies necessary from the punitive damages, on an on-going basis, to continue to fight the future capricious forays & assaults against the harmless citizens’ democracy   and counteract the damages to it, etc. caused by Corporate Japan, the government of Japan, et al, ie. the ‘sword’.

Please see the reference material below:                                                                                         ‘The Submission’ to The Supreme Court of Canada: ‘The SHAREHOLDERS &                Corporations of JAPAN, America, China, Canada, the EU, the TransPacific nations, et al,                                                                                                                                                                vs.                                                                                                                                                               the (harmless) Canadian NON shareholders, both; Native & non Native, et al’    (see; davidehsmith.wordpress.com)

which includes:                                                                                                                                           1) The W.A.D. Accord,                                                                                                                       2) ‘The MERKEL (Chancellor of Germany) Letter; To Sue, or, Be Sued?’                           &                                                                                                                                                             3) et al.

‘The Submission’ also considers:                                                                                                         1) what is a ‘good corporate citizen’                                                                                                     &                                                                                                                                                                     2) how to make those corporations which are not good corporate citizens to conform, or, to make the corporations persona non grata.   

The letter to Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, ‘Prime Minister Abe; You’ve been Served with; The NOTIFICATION of Pre-existing CHALLENGE to The TPP’, was sent separately.

Please also see; ‘The Basis for Litigation & Litigation Funders; Suing the Global Corporate Economy’.                                                                                                                   ***                                                                                                                                               Mr.Yamada & the citizens of Japan, I look forward to reading about your thoughts, your questions, your feelings, your improvements, etc., regarding the enclosed.

If you should have any questions, or, problems with the enclosed questions & information, &/or, any other related material, I can be contacted via davidehsmith.wordpress.com

David E.H. Smith                                                                                                                                       – Researcher                                                                                                                                               – ‘Qui tam…’

33) ISDS; The Death of Democracy & Sovereignty, or, an Opportunity to Sue Global Corporate Economy & their Governments?

The Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) is a double edged sword; that is…depending upon how one looks at it. That is to say that some have suggested that the ISDS & the global corporate treaties/’arrangements’ is a death sentence for democracy & the sovereignty of nations, while others look at it as an opportunity to challenge, learn, clarify, modify, re-interpret, &/or, reject the treaties/’arrangements’ based upon the grounds that they are un-ethical, immoral, &/or, legally unconscionable.

However, one of the problems of ISDS is due to the fact that there is, as of yet, no tried & acceptable ‘official’ means whereby the harmless citizens of the European Union & non-Native Canadians, et al, can sue the government of Canada (or, their EU governments), or Corporate Canada/European Union for throwing in their, the governments’, support with & for Corporate Canada & its global corporate associates at the expense of the harmless taxpayers without recourse & appeals.

And, while it may be regrettable that the harmless Canadians taxpayers have been conditioned, &/or, lead to be believe, that ‘their opposing’ political parties & ‘their’ sine cure senate (ie. upper house) has protected them & will continue to protect them from litigious economic bullies & enemies, both; foreign & domestic, they, the ‘harmless’ citizens, are continuing to be told that it is the nature of ‘their’ true democracy(ies) that by voting with an informed opinion for the party of ‘their choice’, they, the citizens of Canada, et al, are exercising their right to let their politicians make informed choices on their, the harmless voters’, behalf.

Clearly, the governments of Canada, the European Union, et al, have put themselves in the position, &/or, are preparing to put themselves in the position, of a conflict of interest by siding with the associates of the global corporate economy, and thus, the governments have made themselves unable to defend the rights of their citizens in matters concerning the aforementioned corporations and, the government itself. And, therefore, can a reasonable person conclude that the governments are succeeding in putting themselves & the global corporations above the laws of its citizens & into the hands of their own courts/tribunals (ie. the ‘Death-Star-Chamber’) where the only guilty parties, their citizens, have been predetermined by way of the agreements (ie. the treaties/’arrangements’) prior to the ISDS tribunals’ ‘litigations’?

The problem seems to be that Canadians & the citizens of the EU, et al, may be just unaccustomed to, &/or, unaware of how to challenge/confront ‘their’ governments in a manner similar to which Native Canadians have, &, are continuing to utilize, very successfully. The successful challenges of the Canadian government’s laws continues to demonstrate the basic unfairness of decisions that are un-ethical, immoral, &/or, only marginally legal, etc.

And, by failing to challenge these laws, &/or, those that are intended to render laws ‘unappeal-able’, it enables Corporate Canada & its global associates to further their control of the due diligence information & to close the access door to Corporate Canada’s power & the power of its global corporate associates.

In conclusion, here are 5 important points for the citizens of Canada & the EU, et al, to consider regarding the treaties/’arrangements’ that they may feel have been, or, are being, foisted upon them;

1) under what circumstances would Native Canadians consider co-suing the government of Canada & Corporate Canada with the citizens of the EU, non-Native citizens of Canada, et al, regarding the lack of consultation & the deprivation of the due diligence information (eg. The Compensation in The W.A.D. Accord) by the Canadian government, et al?

2) A) in order to level the playing field between:

the citizens of Canada, the EU, et al,                                                                                           and                                                                                                                                             Corporate Canada & Corporate EU,

how much of your tax dollars (ie. as a tax deduction) do you deem necessary to put towards the suing of the government of Canada, et al, & Corporate Canada, et al, as per ‘The Submission’ to The SUPREME COURT of CANADA:                                                    ‘The SHAREHOLDERS & Corporations of AMERICA, China, Canada, the EU, the Trans -Pacific nations, et al                                                                                                                   v.                                                                                                                                                  the (harmless) Canadian NON-shareholders, both; Native & non Native, et al’

&

The MERKEL (Chancellor of Germany) Letter; To Sue, or, To be Sued’?
&/or,
2) B) who would you prefer to have as the litigation funder* of the suit (see the aforementioned ‘Submission’) against the primary beneficiaries of the Canada-EU CETAgreement by the harmless citizens?
3) what constitutes a ‘good corporate citizen’ in the context of those corporations which are trying to dump their liabilities onto the ‘harmless’ citizens (ie. tort abolishment lead by U.S. corporations) of the sovereign nations that the corporations would like to operate in?

4) what constitutes a ‘fair’ treaty, or, agreement for the citizens that host the ‘good corporate citizens’, ie. would it be preferable for the citizens of the signatory treaties/’arrangements’ if the disputing corporations would only be able to sue each other in the open courts of the sovereign nations that they would like to operate in

&

where the parties in a dispute have the responsibility for finding and presenting evidence particularly if the evidence exposes some of the unethical, &/or, illegal practices/’arrangements’ that exist in the inter-relationships between the Corporations that are presently based in Canada, their lobbyists, the executives of the parties & ‘our’ politicians, et al?

and

5) the harmless citizens of Canada & the EU might seriously consider asking the new PM of Canada, Justin Trudeau, has he even read the CETA & the other Global Corporate Treaties/’Arrangements’ and whether he understands it (competency) & is Trudeau willing to answer the taxpayers’ humble questions (sincerity) after ‘we’, the citizens, have had an opportunity to understand its financial significance to our families’ incomes with the assistance of our trade/economic lawyers?

That is to say, the citizens of the signatory nations might consider asking whether ‘their’ politicians should have to sully their ‘beliefs’ & sales pitches with ‘sordid’ facts that come from actually reading & understanding global treaties/’arrangements’?

Regardless, what happened to the new Canadian Prime Minister Trudeau’s (Corporate Canada East) promises to read, understand, share his understanding of TPP with consultation & questions from the citizens of Canada regarding the treaties, both; ‘domestic’ (ie. First Nations) & foreign (ie. global corporate) especially about how Native & non-Natives Canadians to pay much more for Corporate Canada’s liabilities by reducing transfer payments, services for health (more exacerbation toward privatization) & education, et al?

By way of closing, I look forward to reading about the readers’ thoughts, questions, feelings, improvements, etc. regarding the above. For more information regarding the basis for the aforementioned co-suing of the relevant governments & associates of the global corporate economy, I can be contacted at davidehsmith.wordpress.com

David E.H. Smith                                                                                                                         -Researcher                                                                                                                               – ‘Qui tam…’

* litigation funder; Who is the ‘coveted’ foreign investor who said:

It’s not that we are racist in our dealings with Canadians, it’s just that we can’t stand the way that you suck-up to us.

***                                                                                                                                                       To access ‘The MERKEL Letter’ & Excerpts of ‘The Submission’, see;    davidehsmith.wordpress.com                                                                                                              ***                                                                                                                                                          For the FULL ‘Submission’, see; The SUPREME COURT of CANADA.                                      ***                                                                                                                                                          Please consider sharing the enclosed information & questions with 10 friends who will share it with 10 others…

32) Why Native Canadians Might consider Helping Grassroots citizens of TPP nations, the EU, China, et al, to Sue Corporate Canada & its Global Corporate Assocs.

Another good reason for non-Native Canadians, foreign investors, et al, to support Native Canadians’ in ‘Moving Political talks’ along, Investigation into Missing Native Women, et al…
Native Canadians can Save Non-Natives Canadians, et al, from Corporate Canada’s superseding TPP, CETA & other Global Corporate Treaties/’Arrangements’? However, Under what Circumstances would Native Canadians consider helping non-Native Canadians, et al, to Co-Sue the Federal Government & Corporate Canada, et al, for Deprivation of Due Diligence Info, besides Ending the ‘Designer Racism’ & other considerations?
Non-Natives Canadians, et al, can learn a Great Deal about the Need for Litigation against Corporate Canada & its Representatives in Parliament & Congress.

While the decision to cancel the license to access & pollute a huge amount of water used for fracking by Nexen’s Chinese & Canadian investors may be good for the citizens of the Fort Nelson First Nation, the context of the decision is still unsettled & dangerous for both; Native & non-Native Canadians.

This is the second ‘set-back’ for Corporate Canada’s investors in China’s corporate energy participant, Nexen, in the China – Canada Investment Treaty (C-CIT) whereby Corporate Canada & the government of Canada (PM Harper & the executives of the ‘opposition’ parties) have sold, &/or, deliberately misrepresented to China & other potential signatories of the flurry of Global Corporate Treaties/’Arrangements’; CETA (EU), TPP (Trans Pacific nations) &, by association, the TTIP (U.S – EU), on the basis of unrealistic expectations regarding Corporate Canada’s ability to control;
1) Native politicians & Native voters in order accept unofficial (non-government, or, non-legal, sanctioned fines, &/or, awards) pay –offs
&
2) Non-Native Canadians by way of fanning the flames of the uniquely Canadian ‘designer racism’.

As all of Corporate Canada’s traditional parties (minus the Green party) support the secret Tribunals’ ‘arrangements’, Corporates China & Canada are desperate to avoid having the secret Tribunal of the C-CITreaty financially punish the taxpaying voters prior to the federal election. Corporate Canada is even more desperate to make sure that the decision by the post-election Tribunal deciding in favor of the Chinese & Canadian investors will not:
1) tip-off the Canadian voters & cause the voters to reject the yet to be ratified TPP & CETA
&, perhaps more importantly,
2) tip-off the voters in the U.S., the European Union, the Trans Pacific nations, et al.
And, finally, the Nexen investors have to wait until after the Canadian Oct., 2015 election in order for the faux ‘opposition’ to put some distance between itself & those ‘evil followers of Harper’ (ie. the Conservatives), even though they, the faux ‘opposition’ (the Liberals & the New Democrats), are also supporters of the means to inhumanely & secretly punish the ‘harmless’ voters, both; Native & non-Native, of Canada.

And, if one understands why President G.H.W. Bush explained to Canadians ‘Well, you should have Known’* regarding Corporate ‘America’s’ (ie. Canadian investors, et al, in American companies doing business in Canada) reneging on the FTA as per the soft lumber ‘dispute’, then perhaps one might understand why Presidents Bush, Obama, et al, might very well say the same thing to his fellow American voters & the voters in all of the other potential signatory nations.

And, while some** have concluded that Corporate Canada’s ‘handling’ of grassroots Canadians, particularly, Native Canadians, continues to be repugnant, it may be worthwhile to point out that while grassroots Canadians have been conditioned/educated to defer to government imposed ‘compromises’ & to be reluctant to engage in legal battles, ie.‘suit-adverse’, as opposed to litigious Americans, Native Canadians have wisely & successfully determined that litigation is the only way to get around the secret arrangements that benefit a few band members for the period of an election cycle by engaging in litigation that benefit the entire community by questioning, testing, buttressing & furthering the rights of Native Canadians.

And, while non-Native Canadians do not have the benefit of having the financial & institutional capabilities to sue Corporate Canada & the government of Canada, grassroots non-Native Canadians may find a vast common ground with Native Canadians, whereby Native & non-Native Canadians can exercise & increase the benefits of their version of ‘democracy’ by establishing effective means of checks & balances over the combined forces of Corporate Canada & the representatives that they choose for the voters to select as Members of Parliament. One of the means for accessing the aforementioned checks & balances arises from creating the forums for all Canadians, et al, to share, improve & discuss, etc., the information & the questions in The W.A.D. Accord*** (also referred to as ‘The Australian Question’) which is intended to prevent Native & non-Native Canadians, et al, from continuing to be deprived of the due diligence information that can provide the basis for the more informed financial planning of their families & communities.

Therefore, by looking at the context of the decision to turn down Nexen’s fracking license one can get a better understanding of why Corporate Canada has anxiously help develop the aforementioned Treaties/’Arrangements’ that would supersede the benefits in The WAD Accord & its Compensation while continuing to deprive & now, after the ratifications, legitimize Native & non-Native Canadians, et al, of the information in the Treaties/’Arrangements’ & legitimizing (ie. making it legal for Corporate Canada &/or its Associates to make any & all secret, self-serving arrangements in the future).

David E.H. Smith
– Researcher
– ‘Qui tam…’

*see; ‘Well, you should have Known’ at davidehsmith.wordpress.com
** Who is the ‘coveted’ Chinese investor who stated:
‘When it comes to dealing with Canadians (Corporate Canada & their politicians?) it’s not that we are not racist, we just can’t stand the way that you suck up to us’.
And, which Canadians are coveting this potential Chinese investor & his global associates? ***The W.A.D. Accord, see; Google, or, davidehsmith.wordpress.com
**********
For more Information & Questions re; The Relationship between Human (Nature) Rights & Economics by way of the TTIP, the CET Agreement, TPP, C-CI Treaty, et al, and The WAD Accord
& List of RECENT ARTICLES, LETTERS & NOTIFICATIONS by DEHS,
see; davidehsmith.wordpress.com
***
Please consider sharing the enclosed information & questions with 10 friends who will share it with 10 others…